A metabolomics investigation of non-genotoxic carcinogenicity in the rat.

J Proteome Res

Medical Research Council Human Nutrition Research (MRC HNR), Elsie Widdowson Laboratory , 120 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NL, U.K. , The Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, U.K. , and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre (CSBC), University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QR, U.K.

Published: December 2013

Non-genotoxic carcinogens (NGCs) promote tumor growth by altering gene expression, which ultimately leads to cancer without directly causing a change in DNA sequence. As a result NGCs are not detected in mutagenesis assays. While there are proposed biomarkers of carcinogenic potential, the definitive identification of non-genotoxic carcinogens still rests with the rat and mouse long-term bioassay. Such assays are expensive and time-consuming and require a large number of animals, and their relevance to human health risk assessments is debatable. Metabolomics and lipidomics in combination with pathology and clinical chemistry were used to profile perturbations produced by 10 compounds that represented a range of rat non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (NGC), non-genotoxic non-hepatocarcinogens (non-NGC), and a genotoxic hepatocarcinogen. Each compound was administered at its maximum tolerated dose level for 7, 28, and 91 days to male Fisher 344 rats. Changes in liver metabolite concentration differentiated the treated groups across different time points. The most significant differences were driven by pharmacological mode of action, specifically by the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) agonists. Despite these dominant effects, good predictions could be made when differentiating NGCs from non-NGCs. Predictive ability measured by leave one out cross validation was 87% and 77% after 28 days of dosing for NGCs and non-NGCs, respectively. Among the discriminatory metabolites we identified free fatty acids, phospholipids, and triacylglycerols, as well as precursors of eicosanoid and the products of reactive oxygen species linked to processes of inflammation, proliferation, and oxidative stress. Thus, metabolic profiling is able to identify changes due to the pharmacological mode of action of xenobiotics and contribute to early screening for non-genotoxic potential.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3980845PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr4007766DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rat non-genotoxic
8
non-genotoxic carcinogens
8
pharmacological mode
8
mode action
8
ngcs non-ngcs
8
non-genotoxic
6
metabolomics investigation
4
investigation non-genotoxic
4
non-genotoxic carcinogenicity
4
carcinogenicity rat
4

Similar Publications

Limited advancements in managing malignant brain tumors have resulted in poor prognoses for glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Standard treatment involves surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, which lack specificity and damage healthy brain tissue. Boron-containing compounds, such as boric acid (BA), exhibit diverse biological effects, including anticancer properties.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Gene expression biomarkers can help identify both genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens, which could reduce the need for animal testing.
  • In August 2022, a workshop reviewed current methods for using transcriptomic profiling to detect genotoxic chemicals, examining 1341 papers to find reliable biomarkers.
  • The analysis identified two promising in vivo biomarkers and three in vitro biomarkers that show over 92% predictive accuracy and can be adapted for various testing conditions, with support from workshop participants for their regulatory adoption.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Previously, Japanese Environmental Mutagen and Genome Society/Mammalian Mutagenicity Study Group/Toxicogenomics Study Group (JEMS/MMS toxicogenomic study group) proposed 12 genotoxic marker genes (Aen, Bax, Btg2, Ccnf, Ccng1, Cdkn1a, Gdf15, Lrp1, Mbd1, Phlda3, Plk2, and Tubb4b) to discriminate genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (GTHCs) from non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (NGTHCs) and non-genotoxic non-hepatocarcinogens (NGTNHCs) in mouse and rat liver using qPCR and RNA-Seq and confirmed in public rat toxicogenomics data, Open TG-GATEs, by principal component analysis (PCA). On the other hand, the U.S.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Assessment of genotoxicity and acute oral toxicity of a standardized extract (Holixer).

Drug Chem Toxicol

November 2024

Department of Biology, R&D Centre, Natural Remedies Private Limited, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Article Synopsis
  • Holy basil, also known as Tulsi, is valued for its health benefits in traditional medicine systems like Ayurveda, which include anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.
  • A scientific study assessed the safety of a standardized extract of Tulsi through various tests, including genotoxicity studies and an acute oral toxicity study on animal models.
  • The results indicated that the Tulsi extract is non-genotoxic and safe for oral consumption in doses up to 5000 mg/kg body weight in rats.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The incidence of multiple-organ cancers has recently increased due to simultaneous exposure to various environmental carcinogens. Thunb. () is recognized for its many health benefits, including its anti-cancer properties.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!