The potential role of oral fluid in antidoping testing.

Clin Chem

Chemistry and Drug Metabolism, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Drug, Abuse, NIH, Baltimore, MD.

Published: February 2014

Background: Currently, urine and blood are the only matrices authorized for antidoping testing by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Although the usefulness of urine and blood is proven, issues remain for monitoring some drug classes and for drugs prohibited only in competition. The alternative matrix oral fluid (OF) may offer solutions to some of these issues. OF collection is easy, noninvasive, and sex neutral and is directly observed, limiting potential adulteration, a major problem for urine testing. OF is used to monitor drug intake in workplace, clinical toxicology, criminal justice, and driving under the influence of drugs programs and potentially could complement urine and blood for antidoping testing in sports.

Content: This review outlines the present state of knowledge and the advantages and limitations of OF testing for each of the WADA drug classes and the research needed to advance OF testing as a viable alternative for antidoping testing.

Summary: Doping agents are either prohibited at all times or prohibited in competition only. Few OF data from controlled drug administration studies are available for substances banned at all times, whereas for some agents prohibited only in competition, sufficient data may be available to suggest appropriate analytes and cutoffs (analytical threshold concentrations) to identify recent drug use. Additional research is needed to characterize the disposition of many banned substances into OF; OF collection methods and doping agent stability in OF also require investigation to allow the accurate interpretation of OF tests for antidoping monitoring.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545493PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.209676DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antidoping testing
12
urine blood
12
prohibited competition
12
oral fluid
8
drug classes
8
agents prohibited
8
testing
6
antidoping
5
drug
5
potential role
4

Similar Publications

LC-HRMS screening procedure for the detection of 11 different classes of prohibited substances in dried urine spots for doping control purposes.

Anal Bioanal Chem

January 2025

Doping Control Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Block B, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, BE-9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Dried urine spots have recently been proposed as an alternative matrix in the anti-doping field. Drying urine may open the opportunity to limit microbial and thermal degradation of the prohibited substances during transportation to the anti-doping laboratories without the need for refrigeration or freezing. In this study, a multi-targeted initial testing procedure was developed for the determination of 237 prohibited drugs/metabolites from 11 different classes in dried urine spots.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Annual Banned-Substance Review 17th Edition-Analytical Approaches in Human Sports Drug Testing 2023/2024.

Drug Test Anal

December 2024

Center for Preventive Doping Research, Institute of Biochemistry, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

The 17th edition of the annual banned-substance review on analytical approaches in human sports drug testing is dedicated to literature published between October 2023 and September 2024. As in previous years, focus is put particularly on new or enhanced analytical options in human doping controls as well as investigations into the metabolism and elimination of compounds of interest, which represent central (while not exclusive) cornerstones of the global anti-doping mission. New information published within the past 12 months on established doping agents as well as new potentially relevant substances are reviewed and discussed in the context of the World Anti-Doping Agency's 2024 Prohibited List.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of urinary excretion patterns among exposures to cosmetic preservative, herbicide, and nootropic stimulant in anti-doping analysis.

J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci

December 2024

School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan; Doctoral Degree Program in Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan. Electronic address:

Doping with meclofenoxate, a nootropic stimulant prohibited in-competition by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), is identified through the primary marker of urinary 4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (4-CPA). However, the presence of 4-CPA can also arise from permissible sources. This study ventured into comparing urinary excretion patterns among exposures to permitted chemicals (chlorphenesin and 4-CPA) and the banned stimulant (meclofenoxate) and interpreting the analytical findings according to the reporting requirements.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) and Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) recently ended their anti-doping partnership amidst controversy. We treat this decision, and the motivations underpinning it, as a means of exploring the complexities of anti-doping norms and the blurred lines between image and performance enhancing drug (IPED) use in sport and wider society. Drawing ideas from assemblage thinking, we analyse the evolving power dynamics surrounding IPED use, anti-doping policy, and the role of popular athletes in shaping societal perceptions of the use of, and potential harms associated with IPEDs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Designer drugs and low-level drug cocktails are challenging current anti-doping control programs, prompting the investigation of bioassays that can detect unknown drugs by measuring biological activity instead of relying on their chemical structure.
  • This review discusses advancements in activity-based assays used to identify doping substances and growth promoters in biological samples from athletes and animals, highlighting progress made and limitations encountered, such as interference from natural compounds.
  • The authors propose three key applications for bioassays: characterizing compounds for regulatory purposes, enhancing screening processes in testing programs, and aiding in the identification of drugs to tackle technical challenges in drug detection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!