Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify appropriate selection criteria of clinical scales for future trials, starting from those most commonly reported in the literature, according to their psychometric properties and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains.

Data Sources: A computerized literature research of articles was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINALH, PubMed, PsychINFO and Scopus databases.

Study Selection: Clinical trials evaluating the effects of electromechanical and robot-assisted gait training trials in stroke survivors.

Data Extraction: Fifteen independent authors performed an extensive literature review.

Data Synthesis: A total of 45 scales was identified from 27 studies involving 966 subjects. The most commonly used outcome measures were: Functional Ambulation Category (18 studies), 10-Meter Walking Test (13 studies), Motricity Index (12 studies), 6-Minute Walking Test (11 studies), Rivermead Mobility Index (8 studies) and Berg Balance Scale (8 studies). According to the ICF domains 1 outcome measure was categorized into Body Function and Structure, 5 into Activity and none into Participation.

Conclusion: The most commonly used scales evaluated the basic components of walking. Future studies should also include instrumental evaluation. Criteria for scale selection should be based on the ICF framework, psychometric properties and patient characteristics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1234DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic review
8
outcome measures
8
psychometric properties
8
studies
8
walking test
8
test studies
8
review outcome
4
walking
4
measures walking
4
walking training
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!