A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison between Gleason score and apparent diffusion coefficient obtained from diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer patients. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to connect the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of prostate cancer patients with their Gleason scores (GS).
  • A total of 40 patients with varying GS scores underwent an MRI that included diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and the ADC values were compared to their GS.
  • The results showed significant differences in ADC values across GS groups, with lower ADC values linked to higher GS scores, suggesting that ADC could assist doctors in differentiating between high- and low-grade prostate cancer.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To correlate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of prostate cancer patients with pathological Gleason scores (GS).

Methods: 40 patients with GS 2 + 3, 3 + 3, 3 + 4, or 4 + 4 were selected. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was performed adding axial diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences to the standard MRI protocol. ADC values obtained were correlated with the GS data.

Results: Statistically significant differences of ADC (p < .05) were found among GS groups with a trend of decreasing ADC values with increasing GS.

Conclusions: The ADC values may help clinicians to delineate prostate carcinoma, recognizing its high- or low-grade compartments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07357907.2013.845673DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adc values
12
apparent diffusion
8
diffusion coefficient
8
diffusion-weighted imaging
8
prostate cancer
8
cancer patients
8
adc
5
comparison gleason
4
gleason score
4
score apparent
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!