Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: To evaluate the effects and side-effects of serial sub-conjunctival injections of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in early postoperative period for recurrent anophthalmic contracted socket.
Methods: Retrospective comparative case series at tertiary eye care centre including fifteen adult patients with features of postoperative recurrent socket contraction after buccal mucosal graft. Group A comprised eight patients treated with 10 mg weekly sub-conjunctival injection of 5-FU in the fornices. Group B comprised seven patients taken as control. Main outcome measures were: superior fornix depth (SFD), inferior fornix depth (IFD), and socket volume (SV) at 6 months follow up. Patients were re-evaluated clinically for recurrence at last follow-up.
Results: The mean ± SD values in group A versus group B were as follows: 10 ± 1.6 mm vs 5.1 ± 0.9 mm (p < 0.005) for SFD, 6.7 ± 1.5 mm vs 3.5 ± 0.5 mm (p = 0.02) for IFD; and 2 ± 0.55 ml versus 0.27 ± 0.06 ml (p = 0.005) for SV at 6 months. There was significant improvement in depth of fornices and volume of socket in seven patients in group A. One patient in group A did not benefit from 5-FU treatment. The beneficial effects of 5-FU were observed when first injection was given within 4 weeks after socket reconstruction. There was no recurrence (in six cases) and no side-effects seen in group A at final follow-up of 18.2 (12-24) months.
Conclusions: Weekly injections of 5-FU are effective for stopping the progression of recurrent contracted socket following primary reconstructive surgery. It provides early rehabilitation, and avoids repetitive surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2478-1 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!