AI Article Synopsis

  • Sedation with butorphanol in dogs undergoing intradermal testing (IDT) resulted in significantly smaller allergic reactions compared to dexmedetomidine, but both sedatives had similar subjective assessments of the testing results.
  • The study involved ten dogs with atopic dermatitis, each receiving both sedatives in a randomized order during IDT with various histamine dilutions.
  • Despite smaller wheal sizes with butorphanol, the subjective scoring between the two sedation methods showed a high agreement, indicating that butorphanol does not adversely affect the interpretation of IDT results.

Article Abstract

Background: Sedation is commonly used during intradermal testing (IDT). Morphine and its derivatives have long been avoided because of their histamine-releasing effects.

Hypothesis/objectives: Butorphanol, an opioid agonist/antagonist, will not adversely affect IDT in dogs.

Animals: Ten client-owned dogs diagnosed with atopic dermatitis.

Methods: Dogs were randomized to be sedated with butorphanol (0.4 mg/kg) or dexmedetomidine (5 μg/kg). Routine IDT along with intradermal injections of various dilutions of histamine were performed on the lateral thorax, followed 7 days later by the alternative sedative and IDT on the opposite side. The injection sites were subjectively scored and objectively measured by one investigator, blinded to the sedatives, and compared between groups.

Results: When the mean wheal diameters from the objective measurements of all antigens, including saline and histamine dilutions, were compared, butorphanol was associated with significantly smaller reactions than dexmedetomidine (P = 0.0001). There was a high level of agreement between sedatives when positive reactions subjectively scored as ≥3+ were compared (κ = 0.91). When mean wheal diameters of histamine at concentrations of 1:100,000, 1:400,000, 1:1,600,000 and 1:6,400,000 were compared, there were no significant differences between sedative types. Moreover, the percentage agreement when comparing subjective interpretation of all histamine dilutions between sedations was high (κ = 0.90). However, there was only 69% agreement beyond chance when objective and subjective interpretations of all antigens were compared between sedative groups.

Conclusions: Although butorphanol resulted in significantly smaller wheal size in comparison to dexmedetomidine, it did not affect the overall subjective interpretation of the results of IDT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vde.12085DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subjectively scored
8
wheal diameters
8
histamine dilutions
8
subjective interpretation
8
histamine
5
idt
5
compared
5
effects butorphanol
4
butorphanol versus
4
dexmedetomidine
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!