Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In this genomic era, the ability to assay multiple genomic hot spots that have strong clinical implications is greatly desired. Conventional PCR-based methods suffer from frequent false-positive detections, particularly when a multiplex analysis is desirable. As an alternative to the error-prone conventional methods, multiplex ligase-based genotyping methods combined with CE have a strong potential. In this review, both previously developed methods and emerging methods are described to reveal the specificity, sensitivity, and simplicity of the ligase-based methods. For each step (ligation, amplification, and separation), the principles of several alternative methods are discussed along with their applications to explore the future development of ligase-based diagnostic methods.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201300361 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!