AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to examine the types and origins of bacteria near metal implants in dogs suffering from pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis, which was treated with autogenous bone grafting and instrumentation.
  • - Results showed bacteria were detected in 85% of the dogs after surgery, with higher detection rates via pyrosequencing compared to traditional culture methods, yet no signs of infection recurrence were observed radiologically or macroscopically.
  • - The conclusion indicates that using metal implants in infected spinal areas is safe and does not contribute to infection recurrence, suggesting that the presence of bacteria at the surgical site is not necessarily problematic.

Article Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to identify the presence, type and origin of bacteria adjacent to the metal implant in the infected region in a canine model of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis treated with single-stage anterior autogenous bone grafting and instrumentation.

Methods: Dogs with pyogenic spondylodiscitis underwent one-stage debridement, autogenous bone grafting and titanium plate instrumentation and perioperative antibiotic therapy. The implants and adjacent vertebral bones were removed surgically at various postoperative time points (4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks) for bacteria detection. Bacteria were detected from retrieved spinal implants as well as surrounding bones by culture and/or pyrosequencing methods in 17 (85%) of all 20 animals. The positive rate for bacteria presence was 45% by culture and 80% by pyrosequencing method.

Results: Radiological or macroscopic examination showed no signs for infection recurrence in any animal regardless of bacteria presence at the surgical site. However, organism identical with the causative bacterium for spinal infection was found in only two of nine culture-positive animals.

Conclusion: Within the confines of the study, the use of metallic implants in an infected area did not lead to a clinically relevant infection although bacteria may exist at the surgical site. The use of metallic implants in an infected area of the spine is safe. The metallic implants may not be the “culprit” for the persistence or recurrence of infection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3960409PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3061-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

metallic implants
12
bacteria detected
8
pyogenic vertebral
8
vertebral osteomyelitis
8
canine model
8
autogenous bone
8
bone grafting
8
bacteria presence
8
surgical site
8
implants infected
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!