The aim of this retrospective observational cohort study was to analyse and report the 5-10-year survival rates of endosseous zygomatic implants used in the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla. Forty-three consecutive zygomatic implant placements in 25 patients were evaluated over a 5-10-year period. All zygomatic implant surgery was carried out under general anaesthesia. Nobel Biocare zygomatic machined-surface implants were used, and placement was undertaken using the modified sinus slot method. The main outcome measures and determinants for success were survival of the restored implants and the proportion of originally planned prostheses delivered to patients. Of the 25 patients treated, 12 were male and 13 were female; 19 were non-smokers, and the mean age at time of surgery was 64 years. Patients were treatment-planned for implant-retained bridgework, a removable prosthesis retained by fixed cast gold or milled titanium beams, or magnet-retained removable prostheses. A combination of zygomatic and conventional implants was used in all but one patient. In this study it was shown that the overall success rate for zygomatic implants was 86%, with six of the implants either failing to integrate or requiring removal due to persistent infection associated with the maxillary sinus. All patients received their planned prosthesis, although in six cases the method of retention required modification. This study illustrates that zygomatic implants are a successful and important treatment option when trying to restore the atrophic maxilla, with the potential to avoid additional augmentation/grafting procedures and resulting in a high long-term success rate.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.08.012 | DOI Listing |
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
January 2025
Purpose: The study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes (3.7±0.4yrs) of full-arch immediately loaded fixed maxillary prostheses supported by conventional and unilateral single zygomatic implants versus those supported by conventional and bilateral single zygomatic implants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am
January 2025
Desert Ridge Oral Surgery Institute, 20950 N Tatum Boulevard #200, Phoenix, AZ 85050, USA; Private Practice of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Banner University Medical Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Guided zygomatic implant placement surgery has emerged as a promising solution for patients with severe maxillary bone loss, offering precise implant placement and predictable outcomes. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art techniques, advantages, challenges, and future directions in guided zygomatic implant surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Dent
January 2025
Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Orofacial Prosthodontics, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Complutense University of Madrid, Ramon y Cajal Research Institute (IRYCIS). Madrid, Spain. Electronic address:
Objectives: To in-vitro evaluate the feasibility and accuracy (trueness and precision) of various intraoral scanners (IOS) to digitize maxillectomy defect models with exposed zygomatic implants in situ.
Material And Methods: Six partially edentulous and edentulous maxillectomy defect models with 2 zygomatic implants each were obtained. References scans were obatined by using a laboratory scanner (inEos X5; Dentsply Sirona).
Int J Surg Case Rep
January 2025
Department of Prosthodontics, RAK College of Dental Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates. Electronic address:
Introduction: Rehabilitation of patients with hemimaxillectomy presents a challenge. This case report describes the successful use of zygomatic Corticobasal® implant- supported reconstructed prosthesis.
Clinical Case Presentation: A 20-year-old female patient presented to the clinic following hemimaxillectomy with soft tissue approximation one year ago.
Objective: Evaluate the feasibility of the midface degloving approach (MDA) in total maxillectomy without orbital exenteration (TMWOE) and reconstruction for sino-nasal neoplasms.
Study Design: Retrospective case series.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!