Background Context: Surgical reduction and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is commonly used to recover segmental imbalance in degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, whether intentional reduction of the slipped vertebra during PLIF is essential in aged patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis remains controversial.
Purpose: We compared the outcomes of surgical reduction and fusion in situ among aged patients who underwent PLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Study Design: A prospective randomized clinical trial on the surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis patients aged older than 70 years.
Patient Sample: Between January 2006 and December 2009, 73 patients aged 70 years or older with single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis requiring surgical treatment were included in this study.
Outcome Measures: Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores. Radiographic outcomes included percentage of vertebral slippage, focal lordosis, and disc height.
Methods: The 73 patients were randomly assigned to two groups treated using surgical reduction (Group A, n=36) and fusion in situ (Group B, n=37). Both groups were followed up for an average of 33.2 months (range, 24-54 months). The clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results: Surgical complications were similar in the two groups. The average operative time and blood loss during surgery did not insignificantly differ (p>.05) between the two groups. Spondylolisthesis, disc height, and focal lordosis were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups. There was no obvious difference in clinical outcomes, as assessed using the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, although the radiographic outcomes were considerably better in Group A than in Group B.
Conclusions: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws fixation, with or without intraoperative reduction, provides good outcomes in the surgical treatment of aged patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Better radiological outcomes by intentional reduction do not necessarily indicate better clinical outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.481 | DOI Listing |
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech
January 2025
Neurochirurgická klinika Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc.
Purpose Of The Study: The annual number of spinal fusion procedures has been increasing and is well documented worldwide. The O-arm is slowly becoming the standard for transpedicular screw insertion. The accuracy and safety of this method have been confirmed by many studies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York.
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Department, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Importance: The ability of surgeons to choose the right patient for fusion in addition to decompression when operating for degenerative spondylolisthesis with symptomatic spinal stenosis is debated. The addition of fusion increases risk, morbidity, and costs but has been claimed to give better results for selected patients.
Objective: To investigate whether following surgeons' opinions regarding fusion was associated with clinical outcomes.
Neurospine
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Neurospine
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe utilization, demographics, complications, and revisions for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) with stenosis undergoing decompression or decompression with fusion in the United States.
Methods: A national insurance database was used to identify patients who underwent either decompression and fusion or decompression alone for management of DS from 2010-2022. Utilization trends, demographics, and complications for each procedure were compared.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!