In 2004 was published the first edition of the "Surviving sepsis campaign" guidelines for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock, opening a new era in the treatment of this syndrome. The paradox is that guidelines application have produced positive results despite including in some cases treatments proven ineffective. Eight years later has been published the third edition of the guides, which updates the prior in the light of new knowledge, but the quality of evidence remains weak. In this paper the authors express their critical view on the current edition of the guides, pointing out their weaknesses and suggesting how the development of future editions should be.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2013.07.008 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!