Background: The success of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) is believed to depend on the restoration of the natural anatomy of the joint and a key development has been the introduction of modular humeral components to more accurately restore the patient's anatomy. However, there are no peer-reviewed studies that have reported the degree of glenoid component mal-position achieved in clinical practice and the clinical outcome of such mal-position. The main purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of glenoid implant positioning during TSA and to relate it to the radiological (occurrence of radiolucent lines and osteolysis on CT) and clinical outcomes.

Methods: 68 TSAs were assessed with a mean follow-up of 38+/-27 months. The clinical evaluation consisted of measuring the mobility as well as of the Constant Score. The radiological evaluation was performed on CT-scans in which metal artefacts had been eliminated. From the CT-scans radiolucent lines and osteolysis were assessed. The positions of the glenoid and humeral components were also measured from the CT scans.

Results: Four position glenoid component parameters were calculated The posterior version (6°±12°; mean ± SD), the superior tilt (12°±17°), the rotation of the implant relative to the scapular plane (3°±14°) and the off-set distance of the centre of the glenoid implant from the scapular plane (6±4 mm). An inferiorly inclined implant was found to be associated with higher levels of radiolucent lines while retroversion and non-neutral rotation were associated with a reduced range of motion.

Conclusion: this study demonstrates that glenoid implants of anatomic TSA are poorly positioned and that this malposition has a direct effect on the clinical and radiological outcome. Thus, further developments in glenoid implantation techniques are required to enable the surgeon to achieve a desired implant position and outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793002PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0075791PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glenoid component
12
radiolucent lines
12
accuracy glenoid
8
total shoulder
8
shoulder arthroplasty
8
clinical radiological
8
radiological outcome
8
humeral components
8
glenoid implant
8
lines osteolysis
8

Similar Publications

Background: It is unclear if there are significant changes in clinical and radiographic outcomes between 1 and 2 years postoperatively after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The current multi-center study sought to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM) and radiographic analysis of glenoid and humeral loosening between one and two-years postoperatively in a cohort of patients after primary anatomic TSA (aTSA).

Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent primary anatomic TSA between 2017 and 2018 at two high-volume shoulder arthroplasty centers and had baseline, one and two-year PROMs were included in the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Current concepts and treatment options for complex glenoid bone defects : Patient-specific instrumentation and custom-made implants].

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)

March 2025

Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover (MHH), im Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries Straße 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.

Glenoid bone defects are frequent and the etiology is multifactorial. To prevent increased loosening rates of the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), various techniques are available to address the loss of glenoid bone. When corrective reaming and bone grafting techniques are no longer sufficient, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and custom-made implants have become core strategies for managing these defects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Radiographic measurements have gained wide acceptance in anticipating the risk of inappropriate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study aims to investigate whether the RSA angle overcorrects the base plate inclination, tilting it inferiorly, compared to the base plate correction angle (BCA), which provides neutral inclination and lateralization.

Methods: One hundred normal anteroposterior shoulder radiographs were evaluated to determine the average values of the RSA angle, BCA, base plate orientation angle (BOA), and the base plate shoulder angle (BSA), which represents the amount of overcorrection accomplished via the RSA angle beyond the BCA's scope.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Serum Metal Ion Levels in Patients with Failed Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg

March 2025

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA. Electronic address:

Background: Shoulder arthroplasty systems are transitioning towards modular prosthesis options with the goal of reducing complication profiles and increasing range of motion. Modularity may increase the potential for fretting, corrosion, and subsequent release of metal ions. The purpose of this study was to identify associations between implant designs, metallurgy, patient characteristics, and serum metal ion levels in patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The use of lateralized glenoid components in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is increasing to avoid scapular notching and improve strength and impingement-free range of motion. However, maximizing glenoid lateralization increases stress at the bone-baseplate interface. The ideal type and length of central fixation remains a subject of debate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!