A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Accuracy and validity of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer using a photosensitizer: 8-year follow-up. | LitMetric

Background And Objective: We evaluated an alternative procedure for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer after approval of the study by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Medical University Hospital in 2004. We examined the efficacy and safety of SLNB using the photosensitizer talaporfin sodium (Laserphyrin®, Meiji Seika Pharma, Tokoyo, Japan), compared with current methods.

Study Design/patients And Methods: The study included 21 breast cancer patients (Japanese women; median age, 54 years; range, 35-75). All patients received a breast cancer operation combined with SLNB between June 2004 and May 2005. Three milliliters of talaporfin solution was locally injected into the subareolar region just before the operation. We attempted to identify a sentinel lymph node (SLN) that exhibited fluorescence and was consistent with a radioisotope (RI) localization technique. Our purpose was to verify the accuracy and validity of the talaporfin fluorescence imaging method after 8 years of application.

Results: There was no consistent correlation between fluorescence and pathological SLN metastasis, although all four cases of pathological SLN metastasis revealed positive fluorescence. In some cases in which we could not identify SLNs by the RI technique, we could identify SLNs using talaporfin. The method using talaporfin did not adversely affect the patients after the operation, even the chronic renal failure patient. After 8 years, all patients are alive, and none had lymph node recurrence. Side effects were not observed.

Conclusion: SLNB using the photosensitizer talaporfin sodium in breast cancer patients is considered to be useful as complementary to other current methods. We could evaluate the accuracy and validity of this method 8 years after all of the procedures were performed. In the future, a large-scale clinical study with statistical analyses should be conducted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22183DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
20
lymph node
16
accuracy validity
12
sentinel lymph
12
node biopsy
8
slnb photosensitizer
8
photosensitizer talaporfin
8
talaporfin sodium
8
cancer patients
8
method years
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!