Transnasal PEG tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer.

Gastrointest Endosc

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Published: April 2014

Background: Head and neck cancer (H&NCa) patients have an increased risk of malnutrition and dysphagia because of their malignancy and the adverse events of therapy. Most of these patients require gastrostomies. Four percent to 7% of H&NCa patients are unable to undergo per oral percutaneous gastrostomies. Transnasal endoscopy is an option for gastrostomy placement in selected patients.

Objective: Clinical, epidemiologic characteristics and outcomes of transnasal PEG (t-PEG) placement.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: Tertiary care hospital, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Patients: All patients who underwent t-PEG placement.

Main Outcome Measurements: Epidemiology, adverse events, and outcomes of t-PEG placement.

Results: Sixteen patients underwent t-PEG placement from January 2010 to May 2013. All patients had H&NCa and 56.3% had metastasis. Indications for the transnasal approach were airway compromise, malignant oropharyngeal obstruction, and trismus, among others. All procedures were successful using a 20F gastrostomy tube, push technique, anesthesiologist-guided propofol sedation, and/or nasotracheal intubation. Of all patients, 68.8% were white and 68.8% were men. Mean age was 54 years, and mean body mass index was 20.87. Two patients had a total of 2 adverse events: poor wound healing and wound site infection. Of all patients, 18.75% had leukopenia, 6.25% neutropenia, and 50% lymphopenia. Mean white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, and absolute lymphocyte count were 8.6 × 10(9)/L, 6.57 × 10(9)/L, and .93 × 10(9)/L, respectively. Eleven patients were alive, 2 were lost to follow-up, and 3 had died at the time of review.

Limitations: Retrospective analysis, small cohort, patient selection bias.

Conclusion: t-PEG placement is a viable and safe option for H&NCa patients when the standard endoscopic approach is not feasible.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients
12
h&nca patients
12
adverse events
12
transnasal peg
8
head neck
8
neck cancer
8
patients underwent
8
underwent t-peg
8
t-peg placement
8
count absolute
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!