A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Drusen measurements comparison by fundus photograph manual delineation versus optical coherence tomography retinal pigment epithelial segmentation automated analysis. | LitMetric

Drusen measurements comparison by fundus photograph manual delineation versus optical coherence tomography retinal pigment epithelial segmentation automated analysis.

Retina

*Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; †Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; ‡Department of Ophthalmology, Evangelical Hospital of Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil; and §Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Published: January 2014

Purpose: To compare drusen measurements obtained from color fundus and infrared retromode photographs with those derived from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Methods: Drusen lesions identified on the planar (color and infrared) imaging modalities were manually segmented by two independent graders using previously described reading center software to produce quantitative measurements of drusen area and number. The corresponding volume Cirrus OCT datasets were analyzed using commercial retinal pigment epithelium analysis algorithms to segment the retinal pigment epithelium band and estimated the drusen area. Drusen numbers were extracted from retinal pigment epithelium elevation maps. Intraclass correlation coefficients assessed agreement between graders; graders' average measurements were compared with optical coherence tomography (OCT) using paired T-tests.

Results: Excellent agreement between graders was observed (r = 0.951-0.974). No statistical difference was found in the area values obtained by color (0.85 ± 0.26 mm(2), P = 0.43) or retromode (1.15 ± 0.32 mm(2), P = 0.35) compared with those obtained by OCT (0.98 ± 0.28 mm). The number of drusen identified by OCT (13.15 ± 3.19) was significantly lower than that determined by manual segmentation of color (53.7 ± 13.18) and retromode (100.13 ± 16.18) images.

Conclusion: Although the number of drusen individualized by commercial OCT algorithms is significantly lower than by planar fundus imaging modalities, the OCT-measured drusen area is not affected, suggesting that the algorithm counts confluent drusen as a single drusen.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31829d0015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

retinal pigment
16
optical coherence
12
drusen area
12
pigment epithelium
12
drusen
11
drusen measurements
8
coherence tomography
8
imaging modalities
8
agreement graders
8
number drusen
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!