Management of major post-cochlear implant wound infections.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

Novena ENT-Head Neck Surgery Specialist Centre, Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital, #04-21/22/34, 38 Irrawaddy Road, Singapore, 329563, Singapore,

Published: September 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • The article examines the challenges and management of post-cochlear implant wound infections, highlighting the feasibility of device salvage.
  • Among 432 cochlear implant surgeries from 1997 to 2011, 7 developed major infections (1.62%), primarily due to stitch abscesses in children and the effects of prior radiotherapy in adults.
  • The successful salvage surgeries included skin flap reconstruction and device transposition, although the latter posed risks of damaging the electrode array embedded in new bone.

Article Abstract

In post-cochlear implant (CI) wound infections, a commonly asked question is whether the device could be salvaged and if so, what the challenges were. The aim of this article is to study patients with major post-CI wound infections, identify the risk factors and discuss the management. The case records all CI recipients who developed post-CI wound infections that required parenteral antibiotics treatment or any form of surgery between Jan 1997 and Dec 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 432 CI surgeries performed by the senior author, 7 developed major post-CI wound infection (1.62 %). In children, the commonest etiology was from stitch abscesses. In four out of the five children who developed stitch abscesses, four were due to the use of non-absorbable polypropylene sutures, a technique which had since been discontinued. In adults, the cause was due to the late effects of prior radiotherapy for head and neck tumors. The commonest organism isolated from wound cultures was Staphylococcus aureus. Salvage surgery (complemented by antibiotics) was attempted in six out of eight patients managed. All were successfully salvaged with surgery entailing either skin flap reconstruction (2 patients), transposition of the CI body to new location (1 patient) or both (3 patients). Skin flap reconstruction surgery alone failed to control the infection in patients with a negative culture result and needed a subsequent transposition surgery of the device. Device transposition surgery was a consistently effective therapeutic approach, but carried a higher risk of iatrogenic damage to the electrode array as it might be embedded in new bone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2732-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wound infections
16
post-ci wound
12
post-cochlear implant
8
implant wound
8
major post-ci
8
stitch abscesses
8
skin flap
8
flap reconstruction
8
transposition surgery
8
wound
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!