Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities, differences, and clinical applications.

Can J Ophthalmol

School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 4LU, United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Published: October 2013

Fundus-driven perimetry, commonly known as microperimetry, is a technique for measuring visual field sensitivity, whilst simultaneously viewing the fundus. In this article, we review the technique, focusing on the MP-1 microperimeter (Nidek Instruments, Inc, Padua, Italy); we compare it with conventional static automated perimetry, emphasizing the importance of understanding the effects of the different stimulus conditions and data analyses on the interpretation of microperimetry data. The clinical applications of the technique, in the evaluation of functional and structural changes that accompany retinal diseases, are illustrated by its use in patients with age-related macular degeneration, Stargardt disease, and retinitis pigmentosa. In addition, the advantages and limitations of the technique are summarized.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792399PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.03.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fundus-driven perimetry
8
conventional static
8
static automated
8
automated perimetry
8
clinical applications
8
perimetry microperimetry
4
microperimetry compared
4
compared conventional
4
perimetry similarities
4
similarities differences
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!