Purpose: Fixation of periprosthetic hip fractures with intracortical anchorage might not be feasible in cases with bulky implants and/or poor bone stock.

Methods: Rotational stability of new plate inserts with extracortical anchorage for cerclage fixation was measured and compared to the stability found using a standard technique in a biomechanical setup using a torsion testing machine. In a synthetic PUR bone model, transverse fractures were fixed distally using screws and proximally by wire cerclages attached to the plates using "new" (extracortical anchorage) or "standard" (intracortical anchorage) plate inserts. Time to fracture consolidation and complications were assessed in a consecutive series of 18 patients (18 female; mean age 81 years, range 55-92) with periprosthetic hip fractures (ten type B1, eight type C-Vancouver) treated with the new device between July 2003 and July 2010.

Results: The "new" device showed a higher rotational stability than the "standard" technique (p < 0.001). Fractures showed radiographic consolidation after 14 ± 5 weeks (mean ± SD) postoperatively in patients. Revision surgery was necessary in four patients, unrelated to the new technique.

Conclusion: In periprosthetic hip fractures in which fixation with intracortical anchorage using conventional means might be difficult due to bulky revision stems and/or poor bone stock, the new device may be an addition to the range of existing implants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3936090PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2114-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

plate inserts
12
periprosthetic hip
12
hip fractures
12
intracortical anchorage
8
rotational stability
8
extracortical anchorage
8
extracortical plate
4
plate fixation
4
fixation plate
4
inserts cerclage
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!