Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The objective is to use DW-MR imaging using 3 Tesla MRI to assess the correlation between the mean ADC with degenerative disk disease (DDD). We recruited 34 subjects and used DWI-MR to image lumbar intervertebral disks. We acquired a T2W scan and DWIs. The disks were graded for DDD. Assessment of correlation between mean ADC was made. 170 disks were evaluated. The observed sample correlation between mean ADC and disk degeneration was r = 0.65 [0.55-0.73]. The observed sample correlation between mid-sagittal ADC and disk degeneration was r = 0.61 [0.51-0.70]. The differences between mean ADC of each grade were significant, except between grades 4 and 5. There is a correlation of 0.65 between the mean ADC and disk degeneration. This correlation is not strong enough to use the ADC to determine DDD in clinical settings. There was no evident difference in ADC between the studied anatomic lumbar levels.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/197140091102400416 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!