Periprosthetic femoral fracture--a biomechanical comparison between Vancouver type B1 and B2 fixation methods.

J Arthroplasty

Academic Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Division of Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK; Academic Orthopaedics and Trauma Unit, Aristotle University Medical School, University Campus, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Published: March 2014

Current clinical data suggest a higher failure rate for internal fixation in Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) fixations compared to long stem revision in B2 fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of several fixations in the aforementioned fractures. Finite element models of B1 and B2 fixations, previously corroborated against in vitro experimental models, were compared. The results indicated that in treatment of B1 fractures, a single locking plate can be without complications provided partial weight bearing is followed. In case of B2 fractures, long stem revision and bypassing the fracture gap by two femoral diameters are recommended. Considering the risk of single plate failure, long stem revision could be considered in all comminuted B1 and B2 fractures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

long stem
12
stem revision
12
periprosthetic femoral
8
vancouver type
8
fractures
5
femoral fracture--a
4
fracture--a biomechanical
4
biomechanical comparison
4
comparison vancouver
4
type fixation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!