Comparison of three decontamination methods for Mycobacterium bovis isolation.

Braz J Microbiol

Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidãde de São Paulo , São Paulo, SP , Brasil.

Published: April 2008

SIXTY SAMPLES OF TISSUE FRAGMENTS WITH LESIONS SUGGESTIVE OF TUBERCULOSIS FROM BOVINE ABATTOIRS, KEPT IN SATURATED SOLUTION OF SODIUM BORATE, WERE SUBJECTED TO FOUR TREATMENTS: 4% NaOH (Petroff Method), 12 % H2SO4 and 1.5% HPC (1-Hexadecylpyridinium Chloride) decontamination, and physiological saline solution (control). The HPC method showed the lowest contamination rate (3%) when compared to control (88%, p<0.001), NaOH (33%, p<0.001) and H2SO4 (21.7%, p<0.002). Regarding the isolation success, the HPC method was better (40%) than the control (3%, p<0.001), NaOH (13%, p=0.001) and H2SO4 (1.7%, p<0.001) methods. These results indicate that HPC is an alternative to the Petroff method.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3768399PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822008000200008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

comparison three
4
three decontamination
4
decontamination methods
4
methods mycobacterium
4
mycobacterium bovis
4
bovis isolation
4
isolation sixty
4
sixty samples
4
samples tissue
4
tissue fragments
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!