Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Implementation of evidence-based practices (EBP) in health and mental health settings has not been as successful as anticipated. Patients in safety net settings have even less opportunity to receive evidence-based care. Translation research has been dominated by efficacy trials, which often do not translate to the complexity of safety net settings. Implementation research to date seems to focus mostly on provider and organizational contextual factors more than macro and patient factors crucial to outcomes in safety net settings. Focus on translation and adaptation of interventions to safety net settings, and use of qualitative methods to flesh out complex processes and involve more stakeholders will help give safety net patients access to state of the art care. This issue is important for social workers to understand due to their ethical obligation to advocate for social justice and access to care for vulnerable and oppressed populations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2013.813003 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!