Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is becoming the cross-sectional imaging modality of choice for follow-up of patients with previous rectal cancer to diagnose pelvic recurrence and plan for surgery. The authors conducted a retrospective review of MR imaging examinations performed at their institution for evaluation of local recurrence of rectal cancer in 42 patients. Twenty-six patients had undergone rectal anastomosis and 16 had undergone abdominoperineal resection. The mean interval between initial surgery and recurrence was 2.5 years. Recurrence sites were axial (involving the anastomosis) (n = 19); lateral (sidewall) (n = 6); anterior (prostate or seminal vesicle [n = 2], bladder [n = 4], ureter [n = 3], vagina or uterus [n = 5]); or posterior (presacral fascia [n = 11], sacrum [n = 2]). Other recurrence sites included the pelvic floor (n = 7), sciatic nerve (n = 2), obturator nerve (n = 1), perineum (n = 1), abdominal wall (n = 1), or adnexa (n = 1). Recurrence was confirmed at surgery or by evidence of tumor growth at follow-up imaging. Recurrence patterns, signal intensity characteristics, findings of unresectability, potential MR imaging pitfalls, and the role of MR imaging versus other modalities in evaluating recurrent rectal carcinoma are discussed. Supplemental material available at http://radiographics.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/rg335115170/-/DC1.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.335115170 | DOI Listing |
Acta Oncol
January 2025
The Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects, Aarhus and Aalborg University Hospitals, Denmark; Dep. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Dep. of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Background And Purpose: The prevalence of sequelae following rectal cancer (RC) treatment is high. We investigate the prevalence and temporal change in sexual dysfunction among male RC patient, along with their counselling and treatment needs and associations between sexual dysfunction and clinical factors. Patient/materials and methods: Patient-reported outcome measures were completed 3 and 12 months after RC surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Clin Oncol
January 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan.
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes and adverse events between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients undergoing long-course neoadjuvant radiation therapy (NA-RT) for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC).
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 47 consecutive patients who received NA-RT for LARC between January 2011 and September 2022. Seven and 40 patients were diagnosed with clinical stages II and III, respectively.
Gynecol Oncol Rep
February 2025
Dept of Surgical Oncology, Aster International Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India.
Background: The role of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cytoreductive surgery and/or Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy HIPEC) is evolving, with promising results that improve patient outcomes. This consensus exercise was carried out to address and standardize components of the ERAS protocol pertinent to the Indian context.
Method: The modified Delphi method was employed with two rounds of voting.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol
March 2025
Institute of Medical Science & Institute for Cancer Research, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Background: Combining radiotherapy (RT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a promising strategy that can enhance the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs. However, little is known about RT-induced changes in the expression of immune checkpoints, such as PD-L1, and their clinical implications in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to investigate the association between responsiveness to RT and changes in PD-L1 expression in human CRC tissue and cell lines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeliyon
January 2025
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Background: TG02 is a peptide-based cancer vaccine eliciting immune responses to oncogenic codon 12/13 mutations. This phase 1 clinical trial (NCT02933944) assessed the safety and immunological efficacy of TG02 adjuvanted by GM-CSF in patients with -mutant colorectal cancer.
Methods: In the interval between completing CRT and pelvic exenteration, patients with resectable mutation-positive, locally advanced primary or current colorectal cancer, received 5-6 doses of TG02/GM-CSF.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!