Objective: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation for major depressive disorder (MDD) in escitalopram nonremitters.
Method: In this proof-of-concept study (conducted from July 2009-August 2010) with a prespecified critical α = .10, adults with nonpsychotic MDD (DSM-IV-TR criteria) and residual depressive symptoms (17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score ≥ 4) after 8 weeks of open-label escitalopram were randomized to 6 weeks of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (20-50 mg/d) or placebo augmentation. The primary endpoint, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score change in escitalopram nonremitters (MADRS total score > 10) from week 8 (augmentation baseline) to week 14/end of study, was assessed using analysis of covariance, with last observation carried forward.
Results: For nonremitters (placebo, n = 64; lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, n = 65), the least squares (LS) mean (90% CI) treatment difference for MADRS total score reduction at week 14/end of study (-2.3 [-4.5 to -0.1]; P = .0902) met the prespecified criterion for lisdexamfetamine dimesylate superiority (adjusted effect size, -0.3); the number needed to treat for MADRS remission (MADRS total score ≤ 10) was 6.7. The LS mean treatment difference in remitters was not statistically significant (1.2 [-1.6 to 4.0]; P = .4726). Among randomized participants, 49.4% (42/85) receiving placebo and 60.2% (53/88) receiving lisdexamfetamine dimesylate had ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event, the most frequent with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate being dry mouth and headache (both 11.4%). Mean (SD) vital sign and electrocardiogram changes (placebo vs lisdexamfetamine dimesylate) were 0.5 (8.98) versus 2.3 (9.04) mm Hg (systolic blood pressure), -1.0 (7.19) versus 0.9 (6.61) mm Hg (diastolic blood pressure), -0.4 (7.39) versus 4.8 (8.64) beats per minute (heart rate), and -1.6 (11.23) versus -4.9 (11.84) milliseconds (Fridericia-adjusted QTc).
Conclusions: Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation reduced depressive symptoms in participants with inadequate escitalopram response.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00905424.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/JCP.13m08360 | DOI Listing |
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol
January 2025
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Background: Changes in gastrointestinal physiology following bariatric surgery may affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs. Data on the impact of bariatric surgery on drugs used for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are limited.
Methods: In patients treated with ADHD medication and undergoing bariatric surgery, serial drug concentrations were measured for 24 h preoperatively and one, six and 12 months postoperatively.
Cureus
August 2024
Office of Education and Curriculum, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Carbondale, USA.
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a prodrug stimulant, appears to effectively treat Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children and adults. However, an analysis of the treatment effects of the two subscales (inattentiveness and hyperactivity) within the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) has not yet been done to determine if clinical significance may be attributed to either one. Nor has there been a meta-analysis of the individual doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGynecol Oncol
November 2024
Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States. Electronic address:
J Comp Eff Res
September 2024
Center for Psychiatry & Behavioral Medicine, 7351 Prairie Falcon Rd STE 160, Las Vegas, NV 89128, USA.
To compare long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of centanafadine versus lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (lisdexamfetamine), methylphenidate hydrochloride (methylphenidate) and atomoxetine hydrochloride (atomoxetine), respectively, in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs). Patient-level data from a centanafadine trial (NCT03605849) and published aggregate data from a lisdexamfetamine trial (NCT00337285), a methylphenidate trial (NCT00326300) and an atomoxetine trial (NCT00190736) were used. Patient characteristics were matched in each comparison using propensity score weighting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Psychopharmacol Neurosci
August 2024
Shiraz Nephron-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Objective: Comprehensive evaluation of lisedexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) alone and in combination with topiramate (TPM) was done for treatment of binge eating disorder (BED) in adults aged 18-55 years.
Methods: In the present randomized clinical trial study, 93 patients were selected by convenience sampling method and were allocated to two groups of 48 and 45 using the permuted block randomization method. This study was conducted from January to September 2022 in Shiraz, Iran.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!