A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Assessment of aggressiveness of rectal cancer using 3-T MRI: correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential imaging biomarker and histologic prognostic factors. | LitMetric

Background: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) permits non-invasive assessment of tumor characteristics.

Purpose: To assess the value of DW-MRI as a potential non-invasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in rectal cancer by analyzing the relationship between tumoral apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of MRI and histopathologic prognostic parameters that are not affected by preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

Material And Methods: Forty patients with rectal cancer were assessed with primary staging 3-T MRI, including DWI, before undergoing surgical therapy. In all patients, surgery was performed without neoadjuvant therapy. Mean tumor ADC was measured and compared between subgroups based on pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, MRI parameters (e.g. postoperative local recurrence), and histopathologic parameters, including A (invasive distance: A1, T-stage; A2, mesorectal fascia [MRF] status), B (differentiation grade: B1, poorly differentiated; B2, moderately differentiated; B3, well differentiated), C (others: C1, N-stage; C2, lymphangiovascular invasion).

Results: Mean tumor ADCs were different when comparing groups stratified by histologic differentiation grades (P=0.0192). There was no significant difference in mean ADCs when stratifying patients according to CEA levels, T-stage, N-stage, MRF status, presence of lymphangiovascular invasion, or the presence of local recurrence.

Conclusion: Significant correlations were found between mean ADC values and differentiation grade. ADC may be useful as an imaging biomarker of tumor aggressiveness, but it cannot serve as an independent biomarker of advanced rectal cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0284185113503154DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal cancer
16
aggressiveness rectal
8
3-t mri
8
apparent diffusion
8
diffusion coefficient
8
imaging biomarker
8
tumor aggressiveness
8
adc values
8
cea levels
8
differentiation grade
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!