Chronic pain due to injury to or diseases of the nervous system, known as neuropathic pain (NP), is a common debilitating medication condition for which there are currently several symptomatically effective therapies. Therefore, early identification of NP in the primary and specialty care setting will avoid unnecessary delays in amelioration of symptoms. Given that it is associated with unique symptoms and physical exam signs, several assessment tools have been developed to aid medical practitioners in the identification of patients with NP. The majority of these tools have been developed to differentiate NP from nonNP and to quantify the severity of symptoms that define NP, and some have been used to aid in assessment of response to interventions. This focused review will describe the primary NP assessment tools that are currently available, and discuss their suitability for screening patients and for research applications. Wider use of NP assessment tools will facilitate the development of new therapies, further clarify the epidemiology of this condition, and improve the treatment of NP.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11916-013-0363-6 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
An Automated Tool for Glycosimilarity Assessment of mAb Therapeutic Biosimilars: Trastuzumab and Bevacizumab as Case Studies.
BioDrugs
January 2025
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Background: With the expiration of patents for multiple biotherapeutics, biosimilars are gaining traction globally as cost-effective alternatives to the original products. Glycosylation, a critical quality attribute, makes glycosimilarity assessment pivotal for biosimilar development. Given the complexity of glycoanalytical profiles, assessing glycosimilarity is nontrivial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAn integrated ecotoxicological study reliability (EcoSR) framework for use in toxicity value development.
Environ Toxicol Chem
January 2025
ToxStrategies, LLC, Katy, TX, USA.
A key component of ecological risk assessments is to develop evidence-based benchmarks to assess potential hazards to various receptors. To ensure that toxicity value development is performed using the best available science, the reliability (or inherent scientific quality) of these studies must be considered. The degree of reliability can be evaluated via critical appraisal tools (CATs), though application of such methods assessing ecotoxicological literature for toxicity value development is not well established compared to human health assessments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTopical review: family psychosocial risk screening and social determinants of health assessment.
J Pediatr Psychol
January 2025
Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Objective: Social-ecological factors are highly congruent with social determinants of health (SDOH): Economic Stability; Educational Access/Quality; Healthcare Access/Quality; Neighborhood/Built Environment; and Social/Community Context. In this topical review, the correspondence of social-ecological theory with SDOH and assessment approaches is reviewed. The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is used to show how existing tools may facilitate SDOH screening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLAPS SA: Measuring Attachment to Dogs and Cats Among South American Countries.
Psychol Rep
January 2025
Department of Public Policy, Management, and Analytics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Human biological and cultural evolution is tied to the relationships established with other animals. Attachment is one of the mechanisms established between dogs/cats and humans and allows the generation of affective bonds and close proximity. Many instruments have been used to study attachment of people to their dogs/cats, such as the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLarge-Scale Validation of the Feasibility of GPT-4 as a Proofreading Tool for Head CT Reports.
Radiology
January 2025
From the Departments of Biomedical Systems Informatics (S.K., Jaewoong Kim, C.H., D.Y.) and Neurology (Joonho Kim, J.Y.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Central Draft Physical Examination Office of Military Manpower Administration, Daegu, Republic of Korea (D.K.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science (H.J.S. Y.K., S.J.), and Center for Digital Health (H.J.S., D.Y.), Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.L.); Departments of Radiology (M.H.) and Neurology (S.J.L.), Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea; and Institute for Innovation in Digital Healthcare, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (D.Y.).
Background The increasing workload of radiologists can lead to burnout and errors in radiology reports. Large language models, such as OpenAI's GPT-4, hold promise as error revision tools for radiology. Purpose To test the feasibility of GPT-4 use by determining its error detection, reasoning, and revision performance on head CT reports with varying error types and to validate its clinical utility by comparison with human readers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!