A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Transverse upper gracilis flap with implant in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a case report. | LitMetric

Transverse upper gracilis flap with implant in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a case report.

Microsurgery

Chelmsford, Broomfield Hospital- St Andrew's Centre for Plastic Surgery & Burns, Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust, Court Road, Broomfield, Chelmsford, Essex, UK; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 151, Rome, Italy; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 43b, Sassari, 07100, Italy.

Published: February 2014

Autologous flaps can be used in combination with prosthesis in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the preferred choice among autologous tissue transfer techniques. However, in patients with a peculiar figure (moderately large breasts and large thighs with flat stomach), who cannot use their abdominal tissue, the transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flap with implant is investigated as a further option for breast reconstruction. This report presents a patient who underwent the TUG flap plus implant reconstruction. A bilateral skin-sparing mastectomy was performed removing 340 g for each breast. The volume of the TUG flaps was 225 g (left) and 250 g (right). Preoperative volumes were restored by placing under the TUG muscle a round textured implant. No complications occurred during the postoperative period both in the recipient and donor site and the outcomes of the procedure were good. In cases where the use of the DIEP flap is not possible because of past laparotomies or inadequate abdominal volume, the TUG flap plus implant may be considered as a valid alternative.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/micr.22165DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

flap implant
16
breast reconstruction
12
tug flap
12
transverse upper
8
upper gracilis
8
postmastectomy breast
8
diep flap
8
volume tug
8
flap
6
implant
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!