Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Our experience concerning 605 fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies performed between 1985 and 1988 is reported. FNA specimens of the prostate gland were compared to histological material in 101 cases: 37 patients underwent suprapubic prostatectomy, 15 radical prostatectomy, 28 transurethral resection, and 21 core needle biopsies. Adenocarcinoma was correctly diagnosed by using cytology in 39 out of 40 cases; benign prostatic hypertrophy was confirmed by histology in 54 out of 57 cytologically benign cases. The absolute sensitivity of the FNA biopsy was 98.2%; specificity was 98.1%; efficiency was 96%; and false negative rate was 6.6%. Our data support the value of transrectal aspiration biopsy as a precise and easy method for diagnosing prostatic cancer; the low false negative rate and the high number of correct diagnoses underline the great accuracy of the method.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pros.2990170202 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!