A Patient Focused Solution for Enrolling Clinical Trials in Rare and Selective Cancer Indications: A Landscape of Haystacks and Needles.

Drug Inf J

Pharmatech Oncology, Inc., 789 Sherman Street, Suite 600, Denver, Colorado 80203.

Published: July 2012

Participation of adult cancer patients in US based clinical trials has remained near 3% for decades. Traditional research methodology reaches a small fraction of the target population with a fixed number of predetermined sites. Solutions are needed to ethically increase patient participation and accelerate cancer trial completion. We compared enrollment outcomes of traditional and patient focused research methodologies. A patient prioritized method (Just-In-Time, JIT) was implemented in parallel with traditionally managed sites in three cancer trials. JIT research sites were initiated after candidate patients presented, while traditional sites were initiated in advance. JIT sites enrolled with mean rates no less than, and up to 2.75 fold greater than, traditional sites. Mean patients enrolled per site was comparable (JIT-1.82, traditional-1.78). There were fewer non-enrolling JIT sites (2/28, 7%) compared to traditional sites 19/52, 37%). This retrospective analysis supports JIT as a prospective solution to increase cancer clinical trial enrollment and the efficiency of clinical trial administrative activities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3754447PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092861512443436DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

jit sites
12
traditional sites
12
patient focused
8
clinical trials
8
sites
8
sites initiated
8
clinical trial
8
cancer
5
traditional
5
jit
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!