Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The comprehensive examination and treatment of 80 patients aged 19 to 63 years with strictures of the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) and ureter obstruction was performed. 23 patients underwent probing with ureteral stenting, 30 patients underwent balloon dilation of strictures under fluoroscopic guidance, 18 patients--endoureteropielotomy with "cold" knife, 9 patients underwent endoureteropielotomy using holmium laser. Correction of ureteral stricture with the removal of the stone was performed in 6 patients. It was found that efficiency of the methods increases in the following order: balloon dilatation (73.3%), dissection using "cold" knife (77.8%), probing with ureteral stenting (82.6%), and laser endoureteropielotomy (100%). In general, endoscopic correction of ureteral contractions is a minimally invasive treatment option for restoring its continuity, without perfoming traumatic surgery in 80% of patients with UPJ and ureteral strictures, including complicated by stone formation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!