AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effectiveness of biologic treatments for psoriasis compared to conventional therapies and phototherapy in clinical practice settings, finding that biologics tend to perform better overall.
  • A retrospective analysis of patient visits from 2008 to 2012 was conducted, focusing on various treatment outcomes and using specific evaluation metrics, while excluding certain patients with insufficient baseline data.
  • Results showed a significant difference in improvement, with biologics achieving a 70.2% reduction in disease activity (measured by S-MAPA) at 24 weeks, compared to a 40.4% improvement for conventional treatments, suggesting biologics may be a more effective option.

Article Abstract

Background: The efficacy of biologic treatment for psoriasis has not been compared to that of conventional systemic therapies and phototherapy outside of clinical trial settings.

Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional.

Methods: All patient visits with a code for psoriasis (ICD-9 696.1) in the clinical practice of two dermatologists with a high percentage (over 70% of chief complaints) of psoriasis patients from Jan 1, 2008 to Jan 4, 2012 inclusive were included in this retrospective data analysis. Patients were excluded if the baseline Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at start of treatment was unknown, or less than 3 (moderate). The practice is a comprehensive psoriasis care center in the Northeastern United States serving a metropolitan population of over 4 million people. Patients were divided by treatment type (biologic, conventional systemic or both) and history of previous treatments. Patients were evaluated by Body Surface Area (BSA), PGA, Simple-Measure for Assessing Psoriasis Activity (S-MAPA, calculated by BSA multiplied by PGA). Patients were evaluated at baseline, 8, 12, 16, and 24 weeks after start of treatment. Patients must have completed at least 8 weeks on a single treatment in order to be included.

Results: 46 courses of biologics, 12 courses of conventional systemic therapies, and 18 courses of both together were identified with PGA 3 or greater at baseline. Baseline S-MAPA for biologics was 74, for non-biologic systemics was 62.25. At week 24, S-MAPA improved 70.2% over baseline in patients treated with biologics, patients treated with non-biologic systemics improved by only 40.4% (P<0.05). The average number of prior treatments for patients on biologics was 1.87 versus 1.25 for patients on conventional systemic therapies (P=0.169).

Conclusion: Biologics show superior results to conventional systemic therapies (70% improvement versus 40% improvement) for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, as measured by decrease in S-MAPA (PGA multiplied by BSA) at week 24. These results were observed despite the fact that patients on biologics had a greater baseline severity and had a greater number of previous treatments.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conventional systemic
16
systemic therapies
12
treatment psoriasis
8
comprehensive psoriasis
8
psoriasis care
8
care center
8
patients
8
start treatment
8
patients evaluated
8
non-biologic systemics
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!