[Use of midazolam in hospitalized patients: analysis of medical practice].

Bull Cancer

CHU de Grenoble, unité de médecine palliative, 38043 Grenoble cedex 9, France.

Published: September 2013

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study conducted at Grenoble University Hospital aimed to assess how frequently and in what contexts midazolam is used among hospitalized patients, while also evaluating doctors' views on the drug.
  • Out of 1,323 patients, 44 (3.3%) received midazolam, primarily for managing symptoms like dyspnea, confusion, pain, and psychological suffering, with 82% of these patients having cancer.
  • Physicians perceived midazolam mainly as a signal to stop active treatment and a potential cause of early death, indicating a misunderstanding of its use for sedation versus anxiety relief, highlighting the need for clearer guidelines.

Article Abstract

To evaluate the prevalence and the characteristics of use of midazolam among hospitalized patients and to analyze physicians' representation of this medicine. We conducted a retrospective study between 1st May and 22nd May 2011 in Grenoble University Hospital in France. All patients receiving midazolam during the study period were included, excepted if the prescription was performed in intensive care units, operating rooms or in pediatric units. Physicians from the different units were asked about the characteristics of patients receiving midazolam and about their practice concerning the use of midazolam. Forty-four patients were included, 82 % of whom having a cancer. The prevalence of prescription of midazolam was 3.3 % (44/1,323), 2.8 % (37/1,323) for anxiety relieving and 0.8 % (11/1,323) for sedation. The main refractory symptoms that justified the prescription were dyspnea (36.4 %), confusion (29.5 %), pain (27.3 %) and psychological suffering (27.3 %). Twenty-eight physicians were asked about their practice. The main representations of midazolam were the stop of active treatment (46.5 %) and premature cause of death (46.5 %). Practice of sedation is under-estimated by physicians as they have difficulties to differentiate anxiety relieving and sedation and they have difficulties to initiate a sedation. A guideline to help physicians using midazolam could improve practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/bdc.2013.1795DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

midazolam hospitalized
8
hospitalized patients
8
patients receiving
8
receiving midazolam
8
anxiety relieving
8
midazolam
7
patients
5
[use midazolam
4
patients analysis
4
analysis medical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!