Background: There is scarce information on whether performing the precut procedure early rather than after several cannulation attempts is associated with different success and complication rates.

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was is to compare the early precut technique with the standard one in terms of the results and complications.

Methods: The contemporary success rate and postoperative complications in 792 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cases were frequently observed during the period from June 2007 to May 2011, and 56 of these cases were carried out with precut biliary sphincterotomy after the standard sphincterotomy had failed.

Results: The success rate for standard sphincterotomy was 89.8%: 51 out of 56 cases were carried out with precut biliary sphincterotomy and succeeded. The total success rate was 96.3%. The difference was significant (χ2=25.62, p<0.01) compared to the success rate of first cannulation, while the difference in complication rates between precut and standard sphincterotomy was minor (9.9 vs. 12.5%, p>0.05).

Conclusion: Early precut with a needle-knife in a difficult biliary cannulation was safe and effective if performed by experienced endoscopists.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2834-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

early precut
12
success rate
12
precut needle-knife
8
needle-knife difficult
8
difficult biliary
8
biliary cannulation
8
cases carried
8
carried precut
8
precut biliary
8
biliary sphincterotomy
8

Similar Publications

Acute pancreatitis, which sometimes results in mortality, is a significant complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Many studies have been conducted to predict and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), and meta-analyses have been reported that summarized these studies. However, many issues remain unresolved.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Early colorectal cancer (ECC) is often treated with endoscopic resection, which can sometimes lead to perforations, a serious complication.
  • A study of 965 patients found that specific techniques, like endoscopic submucosal dissection, significantly increase the risk of perforation during these procedures.
  • Interestingly, while perforations occurred in 3.4% of cases, they did not affect patient survival, indicating that the type of resection performed is a key factor in risk assessment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy: Can nonexperts match the outcomes of experts?

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci

November 2024

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

Background: Nonexpert endoscopists cannot achieve high-quality performance during difficult biliary cannulation, representing a significant challenge; precutting is an effective approach for managing these cases. Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy (TPBS) is considered more effective than needle-knife precutting owing to its wire-guided technique, which may be suitable for nonexpert endoscopists; however, comparisons between nonexpert and expert endoscopists performing TPBS are not well documented.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent TPBS between January 2010 and April 2024 were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of Duodenal Papilla Morphology on the Success of Transpancreatic Precut Sphincterotomy.

J Clin Med

November 2024

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407219, Taiwan.

: This study aimed to evaluate whether the morphology of the duodenal major papilla is linked to transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy (TPS) failure. : We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at our institution. The inclusion criteria involved patients with a naïve major duodenal papilla who required TPS due to difficult biliary cannulation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • ERCP is a medical procedure that can have some risks, including a condition called post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), which can happen when the procedure is tough to do.
  • A study with over 1,500 patients looked at whether doing an early cut (precut technique) helps lower the chances of getting PEP compared to a delayed cut.
  • The results showed that early precut patients had a lower risk of PEP (3.5%) compared to those who had a delayed cut (10.5%), and using a pancreatic stent during the delayed cut can help reduce PEP risk even more.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!