Aims: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LAP-ISR) for rectal cancer in terms of morbidity, oncological outcomes, and functional results.

Methods: Thirty-seven patients with primary low rectal cancer cT1-T2 underwent LAP-ISR. Surgical outcomes, pathological results, postoperative complications, oncological outcomes, and functional results were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: Three patients (8.1%) had carcinoma in situ, 22 (59.5%) had pT1 tumor, and 11 (29.7%) had pT2 tumor. Eleven patients (29.7%) were diagnosed as being node positive, while 26 (70.3%) had node-negative disease. The median operative time was 315 min (range: 195-502). The median blood loss was 37 ml (range: 0-745). One case was converted to open surgery. Pathological complete resection was achieved in all cases. There was no surgical mortality. Postoperative complications of grade III-IV on the Clavien-Dindo classification were observed in 16.2% of the patients. The median follow-up period was 2.8 years (range: 187-2,241 days), and 3-year disease-free survival was 93.1%. No patient developed local recurrence. The functional result was objectively good.

Conclusion: LAP-ISR can be recommended as a feasible, ultimate sphincter-preserving procedure with acceptable functional and intermediate-term oncological outcomes in patients with cT1-T2 very low rectal cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000354034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal cancer
16
low rectal
12
oncological outcomes
12
feasibility laparoscopic
8
laparoscopic intersphincteric
8
intersphincteric resection
8
patients ct1-t2
8
ct1-t2 low
8
outcomes functional
8
postoperative complications
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Chemoradiation-induced lymphopenia is common and associated with poorer survival in multiple solid malignancies. However, the association between chemoradiation-related lymphopenia and survival outcomes in rectal cancer is yet unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of lymphopenia and its predictors in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Perineural invasion (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant prognostic factor associated with poor outcomes. Radiomics, which involves extracting quantitative features from medical imaging, has emerged as a potential tool for predicting PNI. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of radiomics models in predicting PNI in CRC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Several studies explored the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based rectal cancer (RC) staging, but a comprehensive evaluation remains lacking. This systematic review aims to review the performance of AI models in MRI-based RC staging. PubMed and Embase were searched from the inception of the database till October 2024 without any language and year restrictions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Short-Course Radiotherapy with Delayed Surgery or Long-Course Radiotherapy.

Onco Targets Ther

January 2025

Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung City, 833, Taiwan.

Purpose: To investigate the prognostic value of the pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in patients with rectal cancer treated by preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by chemotherapy and delayed surgery.

Patients And Methods: Two hundred and sixty-six consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis receiving preoperative radiotherapy were enrolled. Group 1 patients (n=144) received long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) with 50.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparative study of robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center experience.

Front Oncol

January 2025

Department of Colorectal Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin, China.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) surgeries are commonly performed using either robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RACS) or laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS). This study aimed to compare clinical and surgical outcomes between RACS and LCS for CRC patients.

Methods: We included 225 patients from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital (TJMUCH) between January 2021 and June 2024, divided into RACS (n=82) and LCS (n=143) groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!