Purpose: To assess the impact of using an advanced electronic health record (EHR) on hospital quality and patient satisfaction.
Method: This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was conducted in 2012 to evaluate the association between advanced EHR use (Healthcare Information Management Systems Society [HIMSS] Stage 6 or 7 as of December 2012) and estimated process and experience of care scores for hospitals under the Medicare Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, using data from the American Hospital Association for 2008 to 2010. Generalized linear regression models were fit to test the association between advanced EHR use with process of care and experience of care, controlling for hospital characteristics. In a second analysis, the models included variables to account for HIMSS stage of advanced EHR use.
Results: The study included 2,988 hospitals, with 248 (8.3%) classified as advanced EHR users (HIMSS Stage 6 or 7). After controlling for hospital characteristics, advanced EHR use was associated with a 4.2-point-higher process of care score (P < .001). Hospitals with Stage 7 EHRs had 11.7 points higher process of care scores, but Stage 6 users had scores that were not substantially different from those of nonadvanced users. There was no significant difference in estimated experience of care scores by level of advanced EHR use.
Conclusions: This study evaluated the effectiveness of the U.S. federal government's investment in hospital information technology infrastructure. Results suggest that the most advanced EHRs have the greatest payoff in improving clinical process of care scores, without detrimentally impacting the patient experience.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a36cab | DOI Listing |
Ethics Hum Res
January 2025
Professor of health humanities and ethics, psychiatry, and public health sciences at the Center for Health Humanities and Ethics at the University of Virginia School of Medicine.
Moral distress occurs when professionals are constrained from taking what they believe to be ethically appropriate actions or are forced to take actions they believe are ethically inappropriate, challenging their professional identities and representing systems-level issues within organizations. Moral distress has been recognized in a variety of health care-related fields; however, the phenomenon is still comparatively unexplored among clinical research professionals (CRPs). In this qualitative study, we interviewed ten CRPs to unearth root causes of moral distress in this ethically unique profession.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Transl Sci
January 2025
Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common global cause of chronic liver disease and remains under-recognized within healthcare systems. Therapeutic interventions are rapidly advancing for its inflammatory phenotype, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) at all stages of disease. Diagnosis codes alone fail to recognize and stratify at-risk patients accurately.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
December 2024
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn
December 2024
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Temple University School of Pharmacy, United States of America. Electronic address:
Background: The integration of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in healthcare has changed how healthcare is performed, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of these systems among pharmacists. The ability to navigate EHRs is crucial for pharmacy students' success in introductory and advanced pharmacy practice experiences (IPPEs and APPEs). This manuscript describes the development and use of an EHR training environment in an APPE-readiness course.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Board Fam Med
December 2024
From The Center for Professionalism & Value in Health Care, American Board of Family Medicine, Washington, DC (RLP); Research & Policy, American Board of Family Medicine, Washington, DC; and Center for Professionalism & Value in Health Care Washington, DC (AWB).
Despite producing mountains of data in the daily course of care, the documentation labors of frontline clinicians currently return very little value to them or to the health system. The potential of these painstakingly collected data are enormous and clinical registries can extract the extraordinary capacity of these data and transform them into research-ready datasets while protecting the confidentiality of the patients and clinicians. Clinical registries represent transformative tools for primary care research, bringing together the dimensions of clinical practice, research, quality improvement, and policy impact from a large, nationally reflective, diverse sample of practices and patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!