Assessing patient-centered communication in cancer care: stakeholder perspectives.

J Oncol Pract

Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester; Harvard Medical School; Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Boston, MA; Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute/Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States, Rockville, MD; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; Geisinger Health System; Henry Hood Center for Health Research, Danville; School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; The Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR; Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO; and National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.

Published: September 2013

Purpose: Patient-centered communication is critical to quality cancer care. Effective communication can help patients and family members cope with cancer, make informed decisions, and effectively manage their care; suboptimal communication can contribute to care breakdowns and undermine clinician-patient relationships. The study purpose was to explore stakeholders' views on the feasibility and acceptability of collecting self-reported patient and family perceptions of communication experiences while receiving cancer care. The results were intended to inform the design, development, and implementation of a structured and generalizable patient-level reporting system.

Methods: This was a formative, qualitative study that used semistructured interviews with cancer patients, family members, clinicians, and leaders of health care organizations. The constant comparative method was used to identify major themes in the interview transcripts.

Results: A total of 106 stakeholders were interviewed. Thematic saturation was achieved. All stakeholders recognized the importance of communication and endorsed efforts to improve communication during cancer care. Patients, clinicians, and leaders expressed concerns about the potential consequences of reports of suboptimal communication experiences, such as damage to the clinician-patient relationship, and the need for effective improvement strategies. Patients and family members would report good communication experiences in order to encourage such practices. Practical and logistic issues were identified.

Conclusion: Patient reports of their communication experiences during cancer care could increase understanding of the communication process, stimulate improvements, inform interventions, and provide a basis for evaluating changes in communication practices. This qualitative study provides a foundation for the design and pilot testing of such a patient reporting system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3770509PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2012.000772DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cancer care
20
communication experiences
16
communication
12
patients family
12
family members
12
patient-centered communication
8
communication cancer
8
care
8
suboptimal communication
8
qualitative study
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!