Background: Evaluation of biomarkers and clinical factors associated with cancer-specific survival after curative resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases (LM).

Methodology: All patients who had an R0 resection for LM between 2000-2006 were reviewed. Clinical and histological data were assessed; p53 expression was studied by IHC. ERCC1 codon 118 and XRCC1 codon 399 were analyzed by PCR-RFLP using BsrDI and HpaII, respectively.

Results: Out of 119 patients included (80 synchronous LM (67.2%), median number 2 (1-18)), 104 patients (87.4%) received chemotherapy before recurrence; 60 patients (50.4%) had a p53 negative tumor. ERCC1 distribution was: 31(26%) AAC/AAC, 44(37%) AAC/AAT and 44(37%) AAT/AAT. XRCC1 distribution was: 46(39%) CGG/CGG, 53(44.9%) CGG/CAG and 19(16.1%) CAG/CAG. Three and 5-years disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 31%, 22.7%, 77.4%, and 66.6%, respectively. Node ratio >0.2 (p = 0.0042), LM number >3 (p <0.0001), bilobar localization (p = 0.0074) and preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.0036) were associated with a shorter DFS. None of the biomarkers was found to influence DFS. In multivariate analysis, a number of LM >3 was the only independent factor. No factor was found to influence OS.

Conclusions: The studied biomarkers had no significant impact on prognosis. For routine practice, clinical factors remain the only usable available tools.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5754/hge12215DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

resection colorectal
8
liver metastases
8
clinical factors
8
biomarkers prognosis
4
prognosis resection
4
colorectal liver
4
metastases background
4
background evaluation
4
evaluation biomarkers
4
biomarkers clinical
4

Similar Publications

Background: The surgical management of complicated diverticulitis varies across Europe. EAES members prioritized this topic to be addressed by a clinical practice guideline through an online questionnaire.

Objective: To develop evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations for key stakeholders involved in the treatment of complicated diverticulitis; to improve operative and perioperative outcomes, patient experience and quality of life through a systematic evidence-to-decision approach by a diverse, multidisciplinary panel.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of individualized patient data (IPD) to inform the development of evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central in October 2023 to identify RCTs comparing Hartmann's resection (HR), primary resection and anastomosis (PRA), or laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) among patients with class Ib-IV Hinchey diverticulitis. Outcomes of interest were prioritized by an international, multidisciplinary panel including two patient partners.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Should endoscopic submucosal dissection be offered to patients with early colorectal cancer?

Surgery

December 2024

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address:

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is increasingly used to treat early-stage colorectal cancer. This study evaluated the feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection in this setting and the determinants of lymph node metastasis.

Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for early-stage colorectal cancer at a tertiary center between 2011 and 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Is endoscopic submucosal dissection safe in the management of early-stage colorectal cancers?

Am J Surg

December 2024

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly being adopted for the treatment of early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with early-stage CRC treated between 2015 and 2023, using ESD and colectomy databases, categorizing them into three groups: ESD only (n ​= ​24), oncological colorectal resection (OCR) only (n ​= ​90), and OCR after ESD (n ​= ​59). We compared pathological and oncological outcomes among these groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Single port robotic platform offers articulation and 360° camera rotation for anorectal tumour excision in a narrow pelvic space. This study assesses the clinical usefulness and outcomes of SP robotic transanal surgery.

Methods: Nine patients who underwent transanal excision using the SP robotic platform were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!