Background/aims: We analyzed perioperative and long-term postoperative data to determine the effectiveness of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC).
Methodology: 89 LSCs done at our center were classified into 3 groups according to the operative procedure required to treat severe cholecystitis. Perioperative and long-term postoperative results were then compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (s-LC).
Results: Operative time was longer and postoperative CRP level was higher for LSC. Significantly more bleeding and longer operative times were seen only in the LSC-II subgroup, and average postoperative hospital stay was longer only in the LSC-III subgroup. As for long-term (1.5 to 8 years) postoperative results, 3 of 26 LSC-III cases had a relapse of cholecystolithiasis in remnant gallbladder tissue 2 years or later after initial surgery.
Conclusions: There were no serious intraoperative complications such as the bile duct injury, and a smaller proportion of procedures were intraoperatively converted to open laparotomy. It is considered that LSC is a safe, useful surgical procedure to the patients in whom the neck of the gallbladder is anatomically unclear due to cholecystitis or fibrosis although patients undergoing LSC-III should be monitored for cholecystolithiasis in remnant gallbladder tissue. LSC is often the procedure of choice for patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.5754/hge13094 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!