Background/aims: We analyzed perioperative and long-term postoperative data to determine the effectiveness of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC).

Methodology: 89 LSCs done at our center were classified into 3 groups according to the operative procedure required to treat severe cholecystitis. Perioperative and long-term postoperative results were then compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (s-LC).

Results: Operative time was longer and postoperative CRP level was higher for LSC. Significantly more bleeding and longer operative times were seen only in the LSC-II subgroup, and average postoperative hospital stay was longer only in the LSC-III subgroup. As for long-term (1.5 to 8 years) postoperative results, 3 of 26 LSC-III cases had a relapse of cholecystolithiasis in remnant gallbladder tissue 2 years or later after initial surgery.

Conclusions: There were no serious intraoperative complications such as the bile duct injury, and a smaller proportion of procedures were intraoperatively converted to open laparotomy. It is considered that LSC is a safe, useful surgical procedure to the patients in whom the neck of the gallbladder is anatomically unclear due to cholecystitis or fibrosis although patients undergoing LSC-III should be monitored for cholecystolithiasis in remnant gallbladder tissue. LSC is often the procedure of choice for patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5754/hge13094DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

perioperative long-term
12
long-term postoperative
12
effectiveness laparoscopic
8
laparoscopic subtotal
8
subtotal cholecystectomy
8
cholecystolithiasis remnant
8
remnant gallbladder
8
gallbladder tissue
8
postoperative
6
cholecystectomy perioperative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!