What is the most practical, optimal, and cost effective method for performing follow-up after lung cancer surgery, and by whom should it be done?

Thorac Surg Clin

Multidisciplinary Department of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), 2725 chemin Sainte-Foy, L-3540, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 4G5, Canada.

Published: August 2013

Surgery is the treatment of choice for early stage non-small cell lung cancer. In this context, postoperative follow-up is important to diagnose late postoperative complications, as well as to detect recurring cancer or new primaries as early as possible. There is, however, no high-quality evidence regarding the benefits of monitoring programs on survival and quality of life. Most studies recommend clinical and radiological follow-up (radiograph or chest computed tomography) performed more intensively during the first two years and annually thereafter. The physician doing the follow-up can be the thoracic surgeon, the diagnosing physician, or the family physician.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2013.05.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung cancer
8
practical optimal
4
optimal cost
4
cost effective
4
effective method
4
method performing
4
follow-up
4
performing follow-up
4
follow-up lung
4
cancer surgery
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!