Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate recollection, perception and outcome of psychiatric consultation in a general hospital.
Methods: 321 patients with three main diagnoses (substance use, affective, and adjustment disorders), who had been examined by consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrists within the past twelve months, initially took part in a telephone interview and were subsequently asked to complete and return questionnaires by mail.
Results: Response rates for the telephone interview were 75.4%, and 46.7% of patients returned the completed questionnaires. 86.0% of the patients were able to remember seeing the C-L psychiatrist and 43.3% recalled their diagnosis accurately. 70.5% stated that this contact had been helpful. 61.5% remembered being given a psychiatric after-care recommendation, and 43.5% of the patients stated that they either disregarded or prematurely discontinued after-care.
Conclusions: Even though the perception of the consultation is generally positive, many patients are not able to retain the given information on diagnosis and treatment recommendation. To increase continuity of care and to better address patients' needs we altered our C-L structure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.06.007 | DOI Listing |
Rheumatology (Oxford)
January 2025
department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Objective: Pain in hand osteoarthritis (OA) is evaluated with repeated pain questionnaires. It is unclear whether these questionnaires adequately capture changes in pain recalled by patients. This study investigated whether changes on pain questionnaires (real-time evaluation) correspond to recalled pain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
Center for Cognitive Science, Cognitive and Developmental Psychology Unit, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Short-term memory for sequences of verbal items such as written words is reliably impaired by task-irrelevant background sounds, a phenomenon known as the "Irrelevant Sound Effect" (ISE). Different theoretical accounts have been proposed to explain the mechanisms underlying the ISE. Some of these assume specific interference between obligatory sound processing and phonological or serial order representations generated during task performance, whereas other posit that background sounds involuntarily divert attention away from the focal task.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
December 2024
Technical University of Darmstadt, Institute of Psychology.
The goal of the present investigation was to perform a registered replication of Jones and Macken's (1995b) study, which showed that the segregation of a sequence of sounds to distinct locations reduced the disruptive effect on serial recall. Thereby, it postulated an intriguing connection between auditory stream segregation and the cognitive mechanisms underlying the irrelevant speech effect. Specifically, it was found that a sequence of changing utterances was less disruptive in stereophonic presentation, allowing each auditory object (letters) to be allocated to a unique location (right ear, left ear, center), compared to when the same sounds were played monophonically.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCortex
December 2024
Brain Research and Cognition Center (CerCo), CNRS, UMR5549, France; University of Toulouse, Faculty of Health, France.
The precise and fleeting moment of rich recollection triggered by an environmental cue is difficult to reproduce in the lab. However, epilepsy patients can experience sudden reminiscences after intracranial electrical brain stimulation (EBS). In these cases, the transient brain state related to the activation of the engram and its conscious perception can be recorded using intracerebral EEG (iEEG).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
December 2024
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.
The sharing of personal memories is a unique aspect of the human experience. Humans communicate to provide information, to influence, or even to amuse. How do we distinguish between credible and noncredible narratives? Forensic science has identified race, age, and detail quantity as influential.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!