A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Usefulness of a surface cooling device (Arctic Sun®) for therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest. | LitMetric

Aims: Cardio-pulmonary resuscitation and therapeutic hypothermia (TH) have improved the neurological outcomes of patients who have suffered sudden cardiac arrest; however, the benefits of and differences between cooling devices remain unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the significance of the Arctic Sun(®) for surface cooling in patients treated with TH.

Methods: Fifty-one patients (60.2±14.2 years, 42 males and 9 females) who experienced cardiogenic cardiac arrest, including both shockable and non-shockable cardiac arrest, were enrolled in this study. Forty patients were treated with TH using the Arctic Sun 2000(®) for surface cooling, while the other 11 patients were treated with TH using conventional standard cooling blankets. The patients' clinical courses during TH and the neurological outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results: The body temperature before TH was not significantly different between the two groups; however, the minimal body temperature during TH was significantly lower in the patients cooled with conventional standard blankets than in those cooled using the Arctic Sun 2000(®). The rates of catecholamine administration, left ventricular ejection fraction, and mechanical support were not significantly different between the two groups; however, the maximum infusion dose of dobutamine was significantly lower in the patients with the Arctic Sun 2000(®) than in those treated with standard cooling blankets.

Conclusions: The use of TH with the Arctic Sun 2000(®) following cardiac arrest is safe and effective in precisely maintaining the target body temperature, and can be used to reduce the infusion dose of dobutamine to treat heart failure during TH.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.06.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac arrest
20
arctic sun
16
sun 2000®
16
surface cooling
12
patients treated
12
body temperature
12
arctic sun®
8
therapeutic hypothermia
8
neurological outcomes
8
cooling patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!