Histologic evaluation of low-grade or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LG-IN or HG-IN) of the esophagus is important for estimating the risk of progression to invasive carcinoma. Discrimination between LG-IN and HG-IN, or neoplasia and non-neoplastic lesion (NNL), however, is occasionally difficult. This study was designed to evaluate whether cytokeratin expression can be used for discrimination of these lesions. Esophageal Iodine-unstained lesions (n=154), less than 10 mm, were classified into HG-IN, LG-IN, and NNL. These lesions together with 154 foci of normal esophageal epithelium (NEE) were examined by immunohistochemistry for cytokeratins (CK4 and CK13), p53 overexpression, and the MIB-1 labeling index. The ratios of CK4- and CK13-positive staining were scored from 1 to 3. The CK4- and CK13-positive staining ratios were decreased in NNL (73% and 78%), LG-IN (55% and 69%), and HG-IN (33% and 48%), compared to NEE (91% and 95%). The differences between LG-IN and HG-IN, neoplasia and NNL, and among these three lesions and NEE were statistically significant (p < 0.005). The cytokeratin scores correlated with the MIB-1 labeling index (both: p < 0.0001), but not with p53 overexpression. CK4 and CK13 immunohistochemistry could be an objective method for evaluating the risk for progression to invasive carcinoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lg-in hg-in
12
intraepithelial neoplasia
8
risk progression
8
progression invasive
8
invasive carcinoma
8
hg-in neoplasia
8
ck4 ck13
8
p53 overexpression
8
mib-1 labeling
8
ck4- ck13-positive
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!