Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is a major cause of coronary artery disease (CAD). Despite improvement in the management of patients with stable CAD, diabetes remains a major cause of increased morbidity and mortality. There is no conclusive evidence that either modality is better than medical therapy alone for the treatment of stable multivessel CAD in patients with diabetes in a very long-term follow-up. Our aim was to compare 3 therapeutic strategies for stable multivessel CAD in a diabetic population and non-diabetic population.
Methods: It was compared medical therapy (MT), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in 232 diabetic patients and 379 nondiabetic patients with multivessel CAD. Endpoints evaluated were overall and cardiac mortality.
Results: Patients (n = 611) were randomized to CABG (n = 203), PCI (n = 205), or MT (n = 203). In a 10-year follow-up, more deaths occurred among patients with diabetes than among patients without diabetes (P = .001) for overall mortality. In this follow-up, 10-year mortality rates were 32.3% and 23.2% for diabetics and non-diabetics respectively (P = .024). Regarding cardiac mortality, 10-year cardiac mortality rates were 19.4% and 12.7% respectively (P = .031).Considering only diabetic patients and stratifying this population by treatment option, we found mortality rates of 31.3% for PCI, 27.5% for CABG and 37.5% for MT (P = .015 for CABG vs MT) and cardiac mortality rates of 18.8%, 12.5% and 26.1% respectively (P = .005 for CABG vs MT).
Conclusions/interpretation: Among patients with stable multivessel CAD and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, the 3 therapeutic regimens had high rates of overall and cardiac-related deaths among diabetic compared with non-diabetic patients. Moreover, better outcomes were observed in diabetic patients undergoing CABG compared to MT in relation to overall and cardiac mortality in a 10-year follow-up.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.017 | DOI Listing |
Cardiovasc Revasc Med
December 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Baystate Medical Center and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Massachusetts-Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/AGoldsweig.
Introduction: The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) remains an area of research and debate. Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization (CR) by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has emerged as an alternative to traditional culprit-only PCI.
Objective: To investigate the outcomes of FFR-guided CR versus culprit-only PCI in patients with MI and multivessel CAD.
Cardiol Res
December 2024
Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) provides superior long-term outcomes to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have increased prevalence of multivessel CAD, but also increased surgical risk. We investigated whether CKD predicted real-world use of CABG, versus PCI, in patients revascularized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Cardiol
December 2024
Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital/McGill University, Montreal, QC; Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC; Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital/McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address:
Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) frequently present with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and the optimal timing of complete revascularization (CR) in these cases remains uncertain. This study aims to assess major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and procedural complications in STEMI patients with multivessel CAD undergoing immediate (index procedure) versus staged CR. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immediate to staged complete revascularization (CR) in STEMI and multivessel CAD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr
December 2024
Professor of Medicine & Radiology, Georgetown University, Department of Medicine & Radiology. Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute, USA.
Cardiovascular imaging is fundamental and crucial for providing accurate diagnosis and guiding treatment. There are unique clinical benefits and uses of Cardiac CT as well as cardiac PET. There have been advances in cardiac PET as well as Cardiac CT which have led to novel applications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeliyon
December 2024
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
The impact of complete revascularization (CR), achieved through the recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs), on long-term patient outcomes remains uncertain. To evaluate this in patients who achieved CR after CTO-PCI with those who did not due to deferred CTO-PCI, the Asan Medical Center Registry was reviewed to identify coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with CTOs treated between January 2003 and December 2018. Patients were included with single-vessel disease with CTO and with multivessel disease who had undergone revascularization for non-CTO lesions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!