AI Article Synopsis

  • Epinephrine autoinjectors like Auvi-Q and EpiPen are both effective in delivering 0.3 mg of epinephrine for anaphylaxis, but Auvi-Q was designed to be easier to use.
  • A study involving 71 healthy adults compared the bioavailability of epinephrine from both devices, measuring peak plasma concentration and overall exposure.
  • Results showed that both devices produced similar levels of epinephrine in the body and had comparable safety profiles, with most adverse effects being mild and resolving on their own.

Article Abstract

Background: Epinephrine autoinjectors are underused for the treatment of anaphylaxis in community settings. Auvi-Q, a novel epinephrine autoinjector, was designed to be intuitive to use and reduce the potential for use-related errors.

Objective: To compare the bioavailability of 0.3 mg of epinephrine (adrenaline) injected with Auvi-Q and EpiPen in healthy adults.

Methods: In this randomized, single-blind, 2-treatment, 3-period, 3-sequence crossover study, healthy adults (18-45 years old) received a single injection of 0.3 mg of epinephrine with Auvi-Q in one period and with EpiPen in the other 2 periods. Blood samples were obtained before and 14 times during 6 hours after the dose. Outcomes included peak plasma concentration (Cmax), total epinephrine exposure (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] from baseline to the last measurable concentration [AUC0-t] and extrapolated to infinity [AUCinf]), and adverse events.

Results: Seventy-one volunteers (53 male, 74.6%), with a mean age of 33.2 years and a mean body mass index of 25.4, were randomized. Epinephrine peak concentration and total exposure were similar between Auvi-Q (Cmax = 0.486 ng/mL; AUC0-t = 0.536 ng·h/mL; AUCinf = 0.724 ng·h/mL) and EpiPen (Cmax = 0.520 ng/mL; AUC0-t = 0.466 ng·h/mL; AUCinf = 0.583 ng·h/mL). Cmax and AUC analyses demonstrated bioequivalence between Auvi-Q and EpiPen. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild (98%), and all resolved spontaneously. Rates of injection-site pain and bleeding were 13% and 5%, respectively, for Auvi-Q vs 24% and 10%, respectively, for EpiPen.

Conclusion: After a single injection of 0.3 mg of epinephrine, Auvi-Q and EpiPen had similar peak and total epinephrine exposure, were bioequivalent, and had similar safety profiles.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2013.06.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

epinephrine auvi-q
12
auvi-q epipen
12
bioavailability epinephrine
8
auvi-q
8
epinephrine
8
single injection
8
injection epinephrine
8
total epinephrine
8
epinephrine exposure
8
ng/ml auc0-t =
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!