Performance of acceleromyography with a short and light TOF-tube compared with mechanomyography: a clinical comparison.

Eur J Anaesthesiol

From the Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Louvain, CHU UCL Mont-Godinne-Dinant, Yvoir (PED, JM, MG, CD), MDB Engineering, Spin-off University of Brussels ULB, Brussels (MDB), Scientific Support Unit, University of Louvain, CHU UCL Mont-Godinne-Dinant, Yvoir, Belgium (JJ), and Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (AH).

Published: August 2014

Background: Disturbances in the thumb's movement interfere with the functioning of acceleromyography in many clinical settings. The short and light (SL) train-of-four (TOF)-Tube is a new version of a rigid tubular device that was designed to protect the thumb from external disturbances during surgery, even when the hand is not accessible by the anaesthesiologist.

Objective: To compare the precision and performance of acceleromyography performed with the aid of the SL TOF-Tube (AMGTT) with standard isometric mechanomyography (MMG).

Design: Simultaneous arm-to-arm comparison of both methods in the same anaesthetised patient.

Setting: A monocentric study, performed from September 2007 to June 2008.

Patients: Nineteen ASA I to II patients scheduled to undergo lower limb orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia.

Intervention: Neuromuscular transmission monitoring during baseline, onset and spontaneous recovery of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block.

Main Outcome Measures: Initial baseline and repeatability coefficients were assessed during 10 consecutive measurements of the first twitch height (T1) and TOF T4/T1 ratio and compared using a z test. The spontaneous recoveries of defined blockade levels (onset, T1 25% of initial calibration and TOF ratio 0.9) were compared in terms of duration and intensity. Agreement between both techniques was assessed by the Bland-Altman method.

Results: The mean ± SD control TOF ratios were 98 ± 1% (MMG) and 103 ± 2% (AMGTT). The repeatability coefficients were higher (P < 0.001) and the onset was longer (mean 0.44 min) (P < 0.001) when they were measured by AMGTT. The recoveries of T1 25% and TOF ratio 0.9 were not significantly different between the two methods, and the limits of agreement were in the usual range of contralateral comparisons (-19 and +24% for TOF ratio 0.9).

Conclusion: Compared with mechanomyography, acceleromyography performed with the aid of an SL TOF-Tube offered acceptable precision and equivalent performance during neuromuscular block recovery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283645691DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

performance acceleromyography
8
short light
8
repeatability coefficients
8
ratio compared
8
acceleromyography short
4
light tof-tube
4
tof-tube compared
4
compared mechanomyography
4
mechanomyography clinical
4
clinical comparison
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!