Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy for severe spasticity in patients with upper-motor neuron predominant motor neuron disease (U-MND).

Methods: A total of 44 patients with U-MND were referred for discussion of ITB therapy. Baseline and outcomes data were extracted on 35 patients from a clinical spasticity registry at a tertiary referral center. Patients choosing to initiate ITB (n = 20) were compared with those choosing conservative therapy (n = 15).

Results: At baseline, lower average pain score in the non-ITB group was the only significant difference between the 2 groups. A significant reduction in pain scores, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Spasm Frequency Scale, and requirement for oral spasticity medications was observed within the ITB group at early and late follow-up. Within the non-ITB group, there was a significant increase in MAS scores between baseline and late follow-up. A statistically significant difference favoring the ITB group was observed for change in MAS score (P < .0001), Numerical Rating Scale pain score (P = .04), dose of oral baclofen (P = .002) and tizanidine (P = .003), and number of oral medications for spasticity (P = .002). There was no difference between the 2 groups in the progression of hip flexor weakness or in the proportion of patients who became nonambulatory.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ITB can effectively reduce spasticity and related symptoms without compromising function in selected patients with U-MND.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968313496325DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intrathecal baclofen
8
severe spasticity
8
selected patients
8
motor neuron
8
neuron disease
8
itb therapy
8
patients u-mnd
8
pain score
8
non-itb group
8
difference groups
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!