AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to determine the optimal syringe size for manual pediatric fluid resuscitation in cases of septic shock, as existing guidelines recommend rapid fluid delivery which is challenging with standard pumps.
  • A randomized controlled trial involving 48 healthcare providers compared the time taken to administer 900 mL of saline using different sized syringes (10, 20, 30, and 60 mL).
  • Results showed significant differences in resuscitation times, with 20 mL syringes being the most efficient, highlighting the importance of syringe size in improving fluid resuscitation outcomes.

Article Abstract

Background: Goal-directed therapy guidelines for pediatric septic shock resuscitation recommend fluid delivery at speeds in excess of that possible through use of regular fluid infusion pumps. In our experience, syringes are commonly used by health care providers (HCPs) to achieve rapid fluid resuscitation in a pediatric fluid resuscitation scenario. At present, it is unclear which syringe size health care providers should use when performing fluid resuscitation to achieve maximal fluid resuscitation efficiency. The objective of this study was therefore to determine if an optimal syringe size exists for conducting manual pediatric fluid resuscitation.

Methods: This 48-participant parallel group randomized controlled trial included 4 study arms (10, 20, 30, 60 mL syringe size groups). Eligible participants were HCPs from McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Canada blinded to the purpose of the trial. Consenting participants were randomized using a third party technique. Following a standardization procedure, participants administered 900 mL (60 mL/kg) of isotonic saline to a simulated 15 kg child using prefilled provided syringes of the allocated size in rapid sequence. Primary outcome was total time to administer the 900 mL and this data was collected through video review by two blinded outcome assessors. Sample size was predetermined based upon a primary outcome analysis using one-way ANOVA.

Results: 12 participants were randomized to each group (n=48) and all completed trial protocol to analysis. Analysis was conducted according to intention to treat principles. A significant difference in fluid resuscitation time (in seconds) was found between syringe size group means: 10 mL, 563s [95% CI 521; 606]; 20 mL, 506s [95% CI 64; 548]; 30 mL, 454s [95% CI 412; 596]; 60 mL, 455s [95% CI 413; 497] (p<0.001).

Conclusions: The syringe size used when performing manual pediatric fluid resuscitation has a significant impact on fluid resuscitation speed, in a setting where fluid filled syringes are continuously available. Greatest efficiency was achieved with 30 or 60 mL syringes.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01494116.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3729679PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-13-14DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluid resuscitation
24
syringe size
20
fluid
9
resuscitation efficiency
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
health care
8
care providers
8
pediatric fluid
8
participants randomized
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!