AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigated how diabetes mellitus influences the risk of receiving inappropriate or appropriate therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), finding that innovative ICD programming methods can help reduce inappropriate therapy risks for both diabetic and non-diabetic patients
  • - Among the 1,483 participants, those with diabetes showed a lower chance of inappropriate therapy and a higher chance of appropriate therapy compared to non-diabetics, indicating diabetes may affect therapy outcomes
  • - Despite the benefits of innovative programming, diabetic patients experiencing inappropriate or appropriate therapy faced significantly higher mortality risks, highlighting the need for careful therapy management in this group

Article Abstract

Background: The relationship between diabetes mellitus and risk of inappropriate or appropriate therapy in patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and resynchronization therapy has not been investigated thoroughly. The effect of innovative ICD programming on therapy delivery in these patients is unknown.

Methods And Results: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT) randomized patients with a primary prophylactic ICD indication to 3 different types of ICD programming: conventional programming with a ventricular tachycardia zone of 170 to 199 bpm (arm A), high-rate cutoff with a ventricular tachycardia zone ≥200 bpm (arm B), or 60-second-delayed therapy (arm C). The end points of inappropriate therapy, appropriate therapy, and death were assessed among 485 patients with and 998 without diabetes mellitus. Innovative ICD programming reduced the risk of inappropriate therapy regardless of diabetes mellitus, although a trend toward a more pronounced effect of high-rate cutoff programming was seen in patients without diabetes mellitus (P for interaction=0.06). Diabetes mellitus was associated with a decreased risk of inappropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.80; P=0.002) and increased risk of appropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.14; P=0.003). In diabetic patients, there was significantly increased risk of death in those who had inappropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 4.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-11.40; P=0.005) and appropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.87; P=0.037) compared with those who did not.

Conclusions: Innovative high-rate cutoff or delayed ICD programming was associated with a reduction in inappropriate therapy in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus was associated with lower risk of inappropriate therapy but higher risk of appropriate therapy. Appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy was associated with increased mortality in diabetic patients.

Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: NCT00947310.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002472DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diabetes mellitus
32
inappropriate therapy
32
appropriate therapy
20
therapy
18
risk inappropriate
16
icd programming
16
therapy hazard
16
hazard ratio
16
95% confidence
16
confidence interval
16

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!