Use of organic waste for the production of added-value holocellulases with Cellulomonas flavigena PR-22 and Trichoderma reesei MCG 80.

Waste Manag Res

Department of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Mexico DF, México.

Published: August 2013

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined how two microorganisms, Cellulomonas flavigena PR-22 and Trichoderma reesei MCG 80, produce holocellulases using different organic waste substrates.
  • Results showed that using the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) led to varying enzyme activities, with substrate concentration negatively impacting both xylanolytic and cellulolytic activities.
  • The findings suggest that digestates from hydrogenogenic fermentation can be effective substrates for enzyme production, offering a sustainable option for organic waste management and energy production.

Article Abstract

We evaluated the production of holocellulases from the cellulolytic microorganisms Cellulomonas flavigena PR-22 and Trichoderma reesei MCG 80 using as substrates the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) and digestates from a hydrogenogenic-methanogenic bioenergy production process. The first set of experiments (E1) used the mutant actinobacteria C. flavigena PR-22 whereas another set (E2) used the mutant filamentous fungi T. reesei MCG 80. In E1 with OFMSW as substrate, xylanolytic activities ranged from 1800 to 3900 international units g(holocellulose)(-1) (IU g(hol)(-1)), whereas the cellulolytic activities ranged from 220 to 420 IU g(hol)(-1). The variation of agitation speed did not have a significant effect on enzyme activity, whereas the increase of substrate concentration had a significant negative effect on both xylanolytic and cellulolytic activities on a holocellulose feed basis. Regarding E2, the OFMSW was evaluated at 1, 2 and 3 % volatile solids (VS). At 2 % VS the best filter paper activities were 1200 filter paper units (FPU) l(-1); however, in a holocellulase basis the best result was 67 FPU g(hol)(-1), corresponding to 1 % VS. Next, OFMSW was compared with OFMSW supplemented with lactose, digested solids from hydrogenogenic fermentation (D1) and digested solids from a two-stage process (D2). Against expectations, no positive effect was found in OFMSW due to lactose. The best enzymatic titres were in the order D1 > OFMSW ≈ OFMSW + lactose > D2. The use of digestates from hydrogenogenic fermentation for enzyme production holds promise for waste management. It promotes energy and added-value bioproduct generation-a green alternative to common practice of management and disposal of organic wastes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X13492841DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

flavigena pr-22
12
reesei mcg
12
cellulomonas flavigena
8
pr-22 trichoderma
8
trichoderma reesei
8
ofmsw
8
activities ranged
8
cellulolytic activities
8
filter paper
8
digested solids
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!