AI Article Synopsis

  • Right ventricular apical pacing can negatively impact left ventricular function over time, especially in patients with even mild left ventricular dysfunction, typically after about a year of pacing.
  • Research has explored alternative pacing sites, like right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing, which may offer better physiological stimulation but show only moderate effects on heart function without major improvements in quality of life or overall health outcomes.
  • Ongoing multicenter studies are attempting to formally assess the benefits of infundibular septal pacing while addressing the drawbacks associated with right ventricular apical pacing identified in prior research.

Article Abstract

Experimental and clinical studies have shown that right ventricular apical pacing may result in long-term deleterious effects on account of its negative impact on left ventricular remodeling through desynchronization. This risk appears more pronounced in patients with even moderate left ventricular dysfunction and generally occurs after at least 1 year of pacing. As right ventricular apical pacing may be associated with the development of organic mitral insufficiency, other sites that allow for more physiological stimulation, such as right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing, have been developed, with good feasibility and reproducibility. However, the prospective randomized studies and meta-analyses to date have only demonstrated a modest effect on ejection fraction in the medium term, without any significant effect on quality of life and morbimortality. However, the absence of a favorable effect for right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing compared with right ventricular apical pacing in terms of clinical manifestations and patient prognosis appears to be more associated with the designs of these studies, which were not homogeneous with regard to methodology used, judgment criteria, follow-up and, especially, statistical power. Two randomized prospective multicentre studies are currently ongoing in order to evaluate the favorable effect of infundibular septal pacing, when considering the indirect negative effects of right ventricular apical pacing as reported in the literature.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2012.08.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

septal pacing
16
ventricular apical
16
apical pacing
16
ventricular outflow
12
outflow tract
12
tract septal
12
pacing
9
ventricular
8
left ventricular
8
focus ventricular
4

Similar Publications

Background: To investigate the optimization of leadless pacemaker placement and to assess its impact on heart synchronization and tricuspid regurgitation.

Results: A clinical trial was conducted involving 53 patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and Hangzhou First People's Hospital between March 2022 and February 2023. Implantation site localization was determined using the 18-segment method under RAO 30° imaging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Left bundle branch (LBB) pacing (P) has gained rapid adoption. Evidence for direct LBB capture has varied from 30-95% depending on the criteria.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of intraprocedural transthoracic echo guidance to achieve LBB capture.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) is a non-invasive technique for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation planning. However, it is limited to reconstructing epicardial surface activation. In-silico pace mapping combines a personalized computational model with clinical electrocardiograms (ECGs) to generate a virtual 3D pace map.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Ventricular septal pacing has long been performed using a stylet during pacemaker implantation, but with the availability of guiding catheters, His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing have also been performed. However, it is not known to what extent the tip load of the ventricular lead differs when a guiding catheter is used compared with a stylet alone. In this study, the tip load was measured for different stylet stiffness and guiding catheter geometries at sites where His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing were assumed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Deep Septal Pacing for Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

January 2025

Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España.

Introduction: Right ventricular (RV) pacing can impair left ventricular function and cause heart failure, known as pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization (CRT) is its usual treatment; recently left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a potential alternative. Deep septal pacing (DSP), a simplified alternative to LBBAP, is still able to achieve narrower paced QRS than during conventional RV pacing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!